BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25355662)

  • 1. Patient satisfaction with double-door laminoplasty for cervical compression myelopathy.
    Ohya J; Oshima Y; Takeshita K; Oka H; Chikuda H; Taniguchi Y; Matsubayashi Y; Tanaka S
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Jan; 20(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 25355662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient Satisfaction with Posterior Decompression Surgery for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Prognostic Radiographic Factors and Patient-Reported Outcomes for the Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment.
    Ohya J; Oshima Y; Oka H; Saiki F; Taniguchi Y; Matsubayashi Y; Tanaka S; Chikuda H; Takeshita K
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 96():272-279. PubMed ID: 27647024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient satisfaction with surgery for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Fujimori T; Iwasaki M; Okuda S; Nagamoto Y; Sakaura H; Oda T; Yoshikawa H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):726-33. PubMed ID: 21417695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus French-door technique.
    Lee DG; Lee SH; Park SJ; Kim ES; Chung SS; Lee CS; Eoh W
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):E198-203. PubMed ID: 23511650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk factors for closure of lamina after open-door laminoplasty.
    Matsumoto M; Watanabe K; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Chiba K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Dec; 9(6):530-7. PubMed ID: 19035744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.
    Seichi A; Takeshita K; Ohishi I; Kawaguchi H; Akune T; Anamizu Y; Kitagawa T; Nakamura K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 11242374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of lamina closure on long-term outcomes of open-door laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy: minimum 5-year follow-up study.
    Matsumoto M; Watanabe K; Hosogane N; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Chiba K; Toyama Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(15):1288-91. PubMed ID: 22246539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Cervical Sagittal Alignment on Axial Neck Pain and Health-related Quality of Life After Cervical Laminoplasty in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy or Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Comparative Study.
    Fujiwara H; Oda T; Makino T; Moriguchi Y; Yonenobu K; Kaito T
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 May; 31(4):E245-E251. PubMed ID: 29481340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome.
    Houten JK; Cooper PR
    Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 12699550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
    Masaki Y; Yamazaki M; Okawa A; Aramomi M; Hashimoto M; Koda M; Mochizuki M; Moriya H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.
    Chiba K; Ogawa Y; Ishii K; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Maruiwa H; Matsumoto M; Toyama Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):2998-3005. PubMed ID: 17172996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion.
    Highsmith JM; Dhall SS; Haid RW; Rodts GE; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 21388285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term results of tension-band laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: a ten-year follow-up.
    Motosuneya T; Maruyama T; Yamada H; Tsuzuki N; Sakai H
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21196546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of K-Line (-) in the Neck-Flexion Position on Patient-reported Outcomes After Cervical Laminoplasty For Patients With Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
    Kimura A; Shiraishi Y; Sugawara R; Inoue H; Endo T; Takeshita K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Nov; 32(9):382-386. PubMed ID: 31573989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presence of anterior compression of the spinal cord after laminoplasty inhibits upper extremity motor recovery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Hirai T; Kawabata S; Enomoto M; Kato T; Tomizawa S; Sakai K; Yoshii T; Sakaki K; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(5):377-84. PubMed ID: 21540767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified K-line in magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinical outcome in patients with nonlordotic alignment after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Taniyama T; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Yamada T; Yasuda H; Saito M; Inose H; Kato T; Kawabata S; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(21):E1261-8. PubMed ID: 25077905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for poor outcome of cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with diabetes.
    Machino M; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Inoue T; Kobayakawa A; Matsumoto T; Ouchida J; Tomita K; Kato F
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96(24):2049-55. PubMed ID: 25520338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion.
    Yuan W; Zhu Y; Liu X; Zhu H; Zhou X; Zhou R; Cui C; Li J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Jul; 134():17-23. PubMed ID: 25929463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open-door laminoplasty with suture anchor fixation for cervical myelopathy in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Yang SC; Yu SW; Tu YK; Niu CC; Chen LH; Chen WJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Oct; 20(7):492-8. PubMed ID: 17912125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extraordinary positional cervical spinal cord compression in extension position as a rare cause of postoperative progressive myelopathy after cervical posterior laminoplasty detected using the extension/flexion positional CT myelography: one case after laminectomy following failure of a single-door laminoplasty/one case after double-door laminoplasty without interlaminar spacers.
    Fujiwara Y; Manabe H; Harada T; Izumi B; Adachi N
    Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(Suppl 1):170-177. PubMed ID: 28247081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.