These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2535587)

  • 1. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services.
    Hershey N; Bontempo LC
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1989 Nov; 4(4):94-100. PubMed ID: 2535587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services and the implications for education in quality assessment: Part IV.
    Hershey N
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1990 Nov; 5(4):130-7. PubMed ID: 2136677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services: Part II.
    Hershey N; Bontempo LC
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1990 Feb; 5(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 2136661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services: Part III.
    Hershey N
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1990 May; 5(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 2136667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health.
    Cantekin EI; McGuire TW; Potter RL
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1427-30. PubMed ID: 2078202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use, costs, and quality of medical services: impact of the New Mexico peer review system. A 1971-1975 study.
    Brook RH; Williams KN; Rolph JE
    Ann Intern Med; 1978 Aug; 89(2):256-63. PubMed ID: 354451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review to ensure quality in forensic mental health publication.
    Felthous AR; Wettstein RM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 25187283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review and professional ethics.
    Sullivan FW
    Am J Psychiatry; 1977 Feb; 134(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 835742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of Physician and Administrator Peer Review for Selecting Specialist Narrow Network Participants.
    Fuller G; Green J; Litt Deculus C; Black J; Weingarten S; Ramirez G; Spiegel B
    Popul Health Manag; 2019 Apr; 22(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 30070963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
    Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Navigating manuscript assessment: The new practitioner's guide to primary literature peer review.
    Smith DV; Stokes LB; Marx K; Aitken SL
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2019 Jan; 25(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 29498322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Congress moves to bolster peer review: the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986.
    Iglehart JK
    N Engl J Med; 1987 Apr; 316(15):960-4. PubMed ID: 3821850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assessment and quality assurance in medical care.
    Sanazaro PJ
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1980; 1():37-68. PubMed ID: 6753865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer Review Practices for Evaluating Biomedical Research Grants: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
    Liaw L; Freedman JE; Becker LB; Mehta NN; Liscum L;
    Circ Res; 2017 Aug; 121(4):e9-e19. PubMed ID: 28684631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Policy, Practice, and Research Agenda for Emergency Medical Services Oversight: A Systematic Review and Environmental Scan.
    Taymour RK; Abir M; Chamberlin M; Dunne RB; Lowell M; Wahl K; Scott J
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2018 Feb; 33(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 29293077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. American Medical Association policy positions.
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 1603861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.