These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25356046)

  • 1. Wireless esophageal pH capsule for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter clinical study.
    Yang XJ; Gan T; Wang L; Liao Z; Tao XH; Shen W; Zhao XY
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(40):14865-74. PubMed ID: 25356046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and Efficacy of Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients Suspected of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.
    Kessels SJM; Newton SS; Morona JK; Merlin TL
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 51(9):777-788. PubMed ID: 28877081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
    Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring.
    Azzam RS; Sallum RA; Brandão JF; Navarro-Rodriguez T; Nasi A
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2012; 49(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 22766996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical utility and tolerability of JSPH-1 wireless esophageal pH monitoring system.
    Li JN; Liu CL; Tao XH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 13():10. PubMed ID: 23317032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
    Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interference with daily activities and major adverse events during esophageal pH monitoring with bravo wireless capsule versus conventional intranasal catheter: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Iluyomade A; Olowoyeye A; Fadahunsi O; Thomas L; Libend CN; Ragunathan K; Fenster J; Vignesh S
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Feb; 30(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 26952638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ambulatory pH: monitoring with a wireless system.
    Schneider JH; Kramer KM; Königsrainer A; Granderath FA
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Nov; 21(11):2076-80. PubMed ID: 17484003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
    Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wireless pH capsule--yield in clinical practice.
    Roman S; Mion F; Zerbib F; Benamouzig R; Letard JC; Bruley des Varannes S
    Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 22275050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term wireless pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: prolonging the test beyond 48 hours is unnecessary and may be misleading.
    Capovilla G; Salvador R; Spadotto L; Voltarel G; Pesenti E; Perazzolo A; Nicoletti L; Merigliano S; Costantini M
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 28859392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance, tolerability, and symptoms related to prolonged pH monitoring using the Bravo system in Mexico.
    Remes-Troche JM; Ibarra-Palomino J; Carmona-Sánchez RI; Valdovinos MA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2382-6. PubMed ID: 16279888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.
    Bansal A; Wani S; Rastogi A; Rastogi K; Goyal A; Hall S; Singh V; Higbee A; Sharma P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Successful esophageal pH monitoring with Bravo capsule in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease].
    Valdovinos Díaz MA; Remes Troche JM; Ruiz Aguilar JC; Schmulson MJ; Valdovinos-Andraca F
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 15757153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gastroesophageal reflux monitoring: pH (catheter and capsule) and impedance.
    Hong SK; Vaezi MF
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2009 Jan; 19(1):1-22, v. PubMed ID: 19232277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical utility of the wireless pH capsule.
    Lacy BE; Dukowicz AC; Robertson DJ; Weiss JE; Teixeira P; Kelley ML
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011; 45(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 21030875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subcardial 24-h wireless pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with and without hiatal hernia compared with healthy subjects.
    Grigolon A; Cantú P; Bravi I; Caparello C; Penagini R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 104(11):2714-20. PubMed ID: 19638965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. To Bravo or not? A comparison of wireless esophageal pH monitoring and conventional pH catheter to evaluate non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease in a multiracial Asian cohort.
    Ang D; Teo EK; Ang TL; Ong J; Poh CH; Tan J; Fock KM
    J Dig Dis; 2010 Feb; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 20132427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure.
    Marchese M; Spada C; Iacopini F; Familiari P; Shah SG; Tringali A; Costamagna G
    Endoscopy; 2006 Aug; 38(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 17001571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Severe chest pain after retention of wireless pH capsule].
    Duarte-Chang C; Zúñiga Cisneros J
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2023; 43(4):383-386. PubMed ID: 38228307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.