These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25356783)

  • 21. Confidence intervals for distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions in multiple regression.
    Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Jun; 20(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 25844629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Constructing Confidence Intervals for Effect Size Measures of an Indirect Effect.
    Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):600-13. PubMed ID: 26717121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Calculating confidence intervals for prediction error in microarray classification using resampling.
    Jiang W; Varma S; Simon R
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article8. PubMed ID: 18312213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sample size determination for confidence intervals of interaction effects in moderated multiple regression with continuous predictor and moderator variables.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):824-35. PubMed ID: 20805605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Excessive outlier removal may result in cut points that are not suitable for immunogenicity assessments.
    Kubiak RJ; Zhang J; Ren P; Yang H; Roskos LK
    J Immunol Methods; 2018 Dec; 463():105-111. PubMed ID: 30312600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correlation coefficient inference on censored bioassay data.
    Li L; Wang WW; Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):501-12. PubMed ID: 15920894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of the probability of passing the USP dissolution test.
    Wang H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):407-13. PubMed ID: 17479390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An immunoinhibition approach to overcome the impact of pre-existing antibodies on cut point establishment for immunogenicity assessment of moxetumomab pasudotox.
    Schneider AK; Vainshtein I; Roskos LK; Chavez C; Sun B; Liang M
    J Immunol Methods; 2016 Aug; 435():68-76. PubMed ID: 27220271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Precision of the reportable value-Statistical optimization of the number of replicates.
    Burdick RK; Ermer J
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2019 Jan; 162():149-157. PubMed ID: 30240988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Statistical methods of screening cut point determination in immunogenicity studies.
    Shen M; Dai T
    Bioanalysis; 2021 Apr; 13(7):551-563. PubMed ID: 33755515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
    Cheng Y; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sample size and power analysis for endometrial safety studies.
    Su G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):491-9. PubMed ID: 15920893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adaptive designs for noninferiority trials.
    Gao P; Liu L; Mehta C
    Biom J; 2013 May; 55(3):310-21. PubMed ID: 23494872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How well do multiple testing methods scale up when both n and k increase?
    Westfall PH; Manage A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):583-94. PubMed ID: 21516558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical inference for the within-device precision of quantitative measurements in assay validation.
    Liu JP; Lu LT; Liao CT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):763-78. PubMed ID: 20183442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computing confidence intervals for standardized regression coefficients.
    Jones JA; Waller NG
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Dec; 18(4):435-53. PubMed ID: 24079926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Confidence and coverage for Bland-Altman limits of agreement and their approximate confidence intervals.
    Carkeet A; Goh YT
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1559-1574. PubMed ID: 27587594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.