83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25356805)
21. Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Reder M; Kolip P
BMC Womens Health; 2015 Jul; 15():53. PubMed ID: 26198675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a qualitative study.
Chapple A; Ziebland S; Hewitson P; McPherson A
Soc Sci Med; 2008 Jun; 66(12):2425-35. PubMed ID: 18358581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Increased uptake and improved outcomes of bowel cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: results from a pilot study within the national screening programme in England.
Moss S; Mathews C; Day TJ; Smith S; Seaman HE; Snowball J; Halloran SP
Gut; 2017 Sep; 66(9):1631-1644. PubMed ID: 27267903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of gender on decisions to participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.
Clarke N; Gallagher P; Kearney PM; McNamara D; Sharp L
Psychooncology; 2016 Dec; 25(12):1456-1462. PubMed ID: 26864167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Screening for colorectal cancer: sense and sensibilities.
Van Hal G; Hoeck S; Van Roosbroeck S
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47 Suppl 3():S156-63. PubMed ID: 21943969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictors of non-participation in cervical screening in Denmark.
Kristensson JH; Sander BB; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E
Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 38(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 24447699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sustained participation, colonoscopy uptake and adenoma detection rates over two rounds of the Tallaght-Trinity College colorectal cancer screening programme with the faecal immunological test.
McNamara D; Leen R; Seng-Lee C; Shearer N; Crotty P; Neary P; Walsh P; Boran G; O'Morain C
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Dec; 26(12):1415-21. PubMed ID: 25244415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exploratory study examining barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening.
Paddison JS; Yip MJ
Aust J Rural Health; 2010 Feb; 18(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 20136809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tailored telephone counselling to increase participation of underusers in a population-based colorectal cancer-screening programme with faecal occult blood test: A randomized controlled trial.
Denis B; Broc G; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Gana K; Perrin P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2017 Feb; 65(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28089385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Self-assessed health, perceived stress and non-participation in breast cancer screening: A Danish cohort study.
Jensen LF; Pedersen AF; Andersen B; Vedsted P
Prev Med; 2015 Dec; 81():392-8. PubMed ID: 26494608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mammography Screening Uptake among Female Health Care Workers in Primary Health Care Centers in Palestine - Motivators and Barriers.
Nazzal Z; Sholi H; Sholi S; Sholi M; Lahaseh R
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(5):2549-54. PubMed ID: 27268628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Small-Bowel Cancer].
Kagaya Y; Sakamoto H; Yamamoto H
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2016 May; 43(5):509-12. PubMed ID: 27210079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Can a mobile phone short message increase participation in breast cancer screening programmes?].
Arcas MM; Buron A; Ramis O; Esturi M; Hernández C; Macià F
Rev Calid Asist; 2014; 29(4):188-96. PubMed ID: 25002239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development and preliminary evaluation of a bowel cancer screening decision aid for adults with lower literacy.
Smith SK; Trevena L; Barratt A; Dixon A; Nutbeam D; Simpson JM; McCaffery KJ
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Jun; 75(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 19272747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bowel cancer screening in Australia.
Millard FB
Aust Fam Physician; 2006 Apr; 35(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 16642232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How frequently should women undergo mammography screening?
Ciatto S
Womens Health (Lond); 2010 Mar; 6(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 20187719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Exploring GPs' experiences of using diagnostic tools for cancer: a qualitative study in primary care.
Green T; Martins T; Hamilton W; Rubin G; Elliott K; Macleod U
Fam Pract; 2015 Feb; 32(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 25448163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perspectives of Aboriginal women on participation in mammographic screening: a step towards improving services.
Pilkington L; Haigh MM; Durey A; Katzenellenbogen JM; Thompson SC
BMC Public Health; 2017 Sep; 17(1):697. PubMed ID: 28893225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Organized or individual breast cancer screening: what motivates women?].
Kalecinski J; Régnier-Denois V; Ouédraogo S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Dumas A; Arveux P; Chauvin F
Sante Publique; 2015; 27(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 26414035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Flexible sigmoidoscopy is the best approach for a national bowel screening programme.
Cox B
N Z Med J; 2016 Feb; 129(1430):14-7. PubMed ID: 26914418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
