536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25356929)
1. Rapid grading of fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy using crowdsourcing.
Brady CJ; Villanti AC; Pearson JL; Kirchner TR; Gupta OP; Shah CP
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Oct; 16(10):e233. PubMed ID: 25356929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crowdsourcing to Evaluate Fundus Photographs for the Presence of Glaucoma.
Wang X; Mudie LI; Baskaran M; Cheng CY; Alward WL; Friedman DS; Brady CJ
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jun; 26(6):505-510. PubMed ID: 28319525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving Consensus Scoring of Crowdsourced Data Using the Rasch Model: Development and Refinement of a Diagnostic Instrument.
Brady CJ; Mudie LI; Wang X; Guallar E; Friedman DS
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jun; 19(6):e222. PubMed ID: 28634154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Crowdsourcing as a novel technique for retinal fundus photography classification: analysis of images in the EPIC Norfolk cohort on behalf of the UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium.
Mitry D; Peto T; Hayat S; Morgan JE; Khaw KT; Foster PJ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71154. PubMed ID: 23990935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reliability of retinal photo grading for diabetic retinopathy: Remote graders from a developing country and standard retinal photo grader in Australia.
Islam FMA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179310. PubMed ID: 28632764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Virtual Reading Center Model Using Crowdsourcing to Grade Photographs for Trachoma: Validation Study.
Brady CJ; Cockrell RC; Aldrich LR; Wolle MA; West SK
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Apr; 25():e41233. PubMed ID: 37023420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Crowdsourcing and Automated Retinal Image Analysis for Diabetic Retinopathy.
Mudie LI; Wang X; Friedman DS; Brady CJ
Curr Diab Rep; 2017 Sep; 17(11):106. PubMed ID: 28942485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crowdsourcing participatory evaluation of medical pictograms using Amazon Mechanical Turk.
Yu B; Willis M; Sun P; Wang J
J Med Internet Res; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e108. PubMed ID: 23732572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of diabetic retinopathy screening using fundus photography: Evaluation and epidemiologic factors at Nantes university medical center].
Clément M; Lebreton O; Chaillous L; Weber M
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2019 Mar; 42(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 30857800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing diabetic retinopathy lesions in scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and colour fundus photography.
Nghiem AZ; Nderitu P; Lukic M; Khatun M; Largan R; Kortuem K; Balaskas K; Sim D
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1035-e1040. PubMed ID: 31286663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A telemedical approach to the screening of diabetic retinopathy: digital fundus photography.
Liesenfeld B; Kohner E; Piehlmeier W; Kluthe S; Aldington S; Porta M; Bek T; Obermaier M; Mayer H; Mann G; Holle R; Hepp KD
Diabetes Care; 2000 Mar; 23(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 10868863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of an artificial intelligence system to classify pathology and clinical features on retinal fundus images.
Stevenson CH; Hong SC; Ogbuehi KC
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 47(4):484-489. PubMed ID: 30370587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Grading of diabetic retinopathy from non-stereoscopic color fundus photographs--relationship to fluorescein angiography findings and three-year prognosis].
Kitano S
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Sep; 109(9):563-72. PubMed ID: 16218434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness.
Tufail A; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Egan C; Rudisill C; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Bailey C; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(92):1-72. PubMed ID: 27981917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated detection of fundus photographic red lesions in diabetic retinopathy.
Larsen M; Godt J; Larsen N; Lund-Andersen H; Sjølie AK; Agardh E; Kalm H; Grunkin M; Owens DR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Feb; 44(2):761-6. PubMed ID: 12556411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic accuracy of single- and five-field fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening by primary care physicians.
Srihatrai P; Hlowchitsieng T
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 66(1):94-97. PubMed ID: 29283131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
Li Z; Wu C; Olayiwola JN; Hilaire DS; Huang JJ
Conn Med; 2012 Feb; 76(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 22670358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Handheld fundus camera performance, image quality and outcomes of diabetic retinopathy grading in a pilot screening study.
Kubin AM; Wirkkala J; Keskitalo A; Ohtonen P; Hautala N
Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 99(8):e1415-e1420. PubMed ID: 33724706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diabetic retinopathy: comparison of the diagnostic features of ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy Optomap with ETDRS 7-field fundus photography].
Kernt M; Pinter F; Hadi I; Hirneiss C; Haritoglou C; Kampik A; Ulbig MW; Neubauer AS
Ophthalmologe; 2011 Feb; 108(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 20683601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
