249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25357106)
1. Documentation of quality control and operator training at point-of-care testing: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 106 institutions.
Dyhdalo KS; Howanitz PJ; Wilkinson DS; Souers RJ; Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Nov; 138(11):1444-8. PubMed ID: 25357106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bedside glucose monitoring quality control practices. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of program quality control documentation, program characteristics, and accuracy performance in 544 institutions.
Jones BA; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Apr; 120(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 8619744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.
Shephard MD; Mazzachi BC; Watkinson L; Shephard AK; Laurence C; Gialamas A; Bubner T
Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1189. PubMed ID: 19689171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assuring quality in point-of-care testing: evolution of technologies, informatics, and program management.
Lewandrowski K; Gregory K; Macmillan D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1405-14. PubMed ID: 22032566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of inpatient point-of-care blood glucose quality control testing.
Corl DE; Yin TS; Hoofnagle AN; Whitney JD; Hirsch IB; Wisse BE
J Healthc Qual; 2012; 34(4):24-32. PubMed ID: 22812686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bedside glucose monitoring. Comparison of performance as studied by the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes program.
Howanitz PJ; Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Apr; 120(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8619743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The application of glucose point of care testing in three metropolitan hospitals.
Sharp L; Farrance I; Greaves RF
Pathology; 2016 Jan; 48(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 27020210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality control practices for calcium, cholesterol, digoxin, and hemoglobin: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study in 505 hospital laboratories.
Steindel SJ; Tetrault G
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 May; 122(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 9593339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What We Should Consider in Point of Care Blood Glucose Test; Current Quality Management Status of a Single Institution.
Choi S; Choi SJ; Jeon BR; Lee YW; Oh J; Lee YK
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Mar; 57(3):. PubMed ID: 33806620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Early morning blood collections: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 657 institutions.
Dale JC; Steindel SJ; Walsh M
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Oct; 122(10):865-70. PubMed ID: 9786345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality assurance of autopsy face sheet reporting, final autopsy report turnaround time, and autopsy rates: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 10003 autopsies from 418 institutions.
Baker PB; Zarbo RJ; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Nov; 120(11):1003-8. PubMed ID: 12049099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Point of care testing: regulation and accreditation.
Carlson DA
Clin Lab Sci; 1996; 9(5):298-302; quiz 303-4. PubMed ID: 10163657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chemistry specimen acceptability: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 453 laboratories.
Jones BA; Calam RR; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9111088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Turnaround time for large or complex specimens in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 56 institutions.
Volmar KE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Karcher DS; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 139(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 25611100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Twenty-five years of accomplishments of the College of American Pathologists Q-probes program for clinical pathology.
Howanitz PJ; Perrotta PL; Bashleben CP; Meier FA; Ramsey GE; Massie LW; Zimmerman RL; Karcher DS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Sep; 138(9):1141-9. PubMed ID: 25171696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Point-of-care testing: inspection preparedness.
Bennett J; Cervantes C; Pacheco S
Perfusion; 2000 Mar; 15(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 10789568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of an expanded point-of-care testing (POCT) site inspection checklist in a large academic medical center: implications for the management of a POCT program.
Gregory K; Tse JY; Wu R; Lewandrowski K
Clin Chim Acta; 2012 Dec; 414():27-33. PubMed ID: 22902708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contemporary quality control practices for antimicrobial susceptibility tests: a report from the microbiology portion of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys program.
Jones RN; Edson DC; Gilmore BF
Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Oct; 80(4 Suppl):622-5. PubMed ID: 6353910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]