283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25358301)
21. Evidence that spillover from Marine Protected Areas benefits the spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) fishery in southern California.
Lenihan HS; Gallagher JP; Peters JR; Stier AC; Hofmeister JKK; Reed DC
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2663. PubMed ID: 33514853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A marine protected area network does not confer community structure resilience to a marine heatwave across coastal ecosystems.
Smith JG; Free CM; Lopazanski C; Brun J; Anderson CR; Carr MH; Claudet J; Dugan JE; Eurich JG; Francis TB; Hamilton SL; Mouillot D; Raimondi PT; Starr RM; Ziegler SL; Nickols KJ; Caselle JE
Glob Chang Biol; 2023 Oct; 29(19):5634-5651. PubMed ID: 37439293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Incorporating larval dispersal into MPA design for both conservation and fisheries.
Krueck NC; Ahmadia GN; Green A; Jones GP; Possingham HP; Riginos C; Treml EA; Mumby PJ
Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):925-941. PubMed ID: 28039952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comanagement practices enhance fisheries in marine protected areas.
Guidetti P; Claudet J
Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):312-8. PubMed ID: 19906064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diverging strategies to planning an ecologically coherent network of MPAs in the North Sea: the roles of advocacy, evidence and pragmatism in the face of uncertainty.
Caveen AJ; Fitzsimmons C; Pieraccini M; Dunn E; Sweeting CJ; Johnson ML; Bloomfield H; Jones EV; Lightfoot P; Gray TS; Stead SM; Polunin NV
Adv Mar Biol; 2014; 69():325-70. PubMed ID: 25358304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biodiversity conservation should focus on no-take Marine Reserves: 94% of Marine Protected Areas allow fishing.
Costello MJ; Ballantine B
Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 Sep; 30(9):507-9. PubMed ID: 26321055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Starting point or solution? Community-based marine protected areas in the Philippines.
Christie P; White A; Deguit E
J Environ Manage; 2002 Dec; 66(4):441-54. PubMed ID: 12503498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sampling mobile oceanic fishes and sharks: implications for fisheries and conservation planning.
Letessier TB; Bouchet PJ; Meeuwig JJ
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 May; 92(2):627-646. PubMed ID: 26680116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term effectiveness of a multi-use marine protected area on reef fish assemblages and fisheries landings.
Rife AN; Aburto-Oropeza O; Hastings PA; Erisman B; Ballantyne F; Wielgus J; Sala E; Gerber L
J Environ Manage; 2013 Mar; 117():276-83. PubMed ID: 23416447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The value of spatial information in MPA network design.
Costello C; Rassweiler A; Siegel D; De Leo G; Micheli F; Rosenberg A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18294-9. PubMed ID: 20176962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An approach for integrating economic impact analysis into the evaluation of potential marine protected area sites.
Dalton TM
J Environ Manage; 2004 Apr; 70(4):333-49. PubMed ID: 15016442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Long-term participation in collaborative fisheries research improves angler opinions on marine protected areas.
Mason ET; Kellum AN; Chiu JA; Waltz GT; Murray S; Wendt DE; Starr RM; Semmens BX
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10146. PubMed ID: 33194393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A global network of marine protected areas for food.
Cabral RB; Bradley D; Mayorga J; Goodell W; Friedlander AM; Sala E; Costello C; Gaines SD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(45):28134-28139. PubMed ID: 33106411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ecosystem management. Science meets politics off California's coast.
Stokstad E
Science; 2010 Mar; 327(5973):1574-5. PubMed ID: 20339047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Setting expected timelines of fished population recovery for the adaptive management of a marine protected area network.
Kaplan KA; Yamane L; Botsford LW; Baskett ML; Hastings A; Worden S; White JW
Ecol Appl; 2019 Sep; 29(6):e01949. PubMed ID: 31188493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Spatial assessment of fishing effort around European marine reserves: implications for successful fisheries management.
Stelzenmüller V; Maynou F; Bernard G; Cadiou G; Camilleri M; Crec'hriou R; Criquet G; Dimech M; Esparza O; Higgins R; Lenfant P; Pérez-Ruzafa A
Mar Pollut Bull; 2008 Dec; 56(12):2018-26. PubMed ID: 18809184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. One size does not fit all: the emerging frontier in large-scale marine conservation.
Toonen RJ; Wilhelm T'; Maxwell SM; Wagner D; Bowen BW; Sheppard CR; Taei SM; Teroroko T; Moffitt R; Gaymer CF; Morgan L; Lewis N; Sheppard AL; Parks J; Friedlander AM;
Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Dec; 77(1-2):7-10. PubMed ID: 24246654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Benefits and Challenges of Scaling Up Expansion of Marine Protected Area Networks in the Verde Island Passage, Central Philippines.
Horigue V; Pressey RL; Mills M; Brotánková J; Cabral R; Andréfouët S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135789. PubMed ID: 26288089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of protogynous sex change on recovery of fish populations within marine protected areas.
Easter EE; Adreani MS; Hamilton SL; Steele MA; Pang S; White JW
Ecol Appl; 2020 Apr; 30(3):e02070. PubMed ID: 31903628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Drivers of ecological effectiveness of marine protected areas: A meta-analytic approach from the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean (Brazil).
Ferreira HM; Magris RA; Floeter SR; Ferreira CEL
J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 301():113889. PubMed ID: 34610560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
