833 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25359645)
1. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W
J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws.
Patzelt SB; Vonau S; Stampf S; Att W
J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Aug; 144(8):914-20. PubMed ID: 23904578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoral Scanning Systems: Need for Maintenance.
Rehmann P; Sichwardt V; Wöstmann B
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(1):27-29. PubMed ID: 28085974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis.
Nedelcu RG; Persson AS
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1461-71. PubMed ID: 25134995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.
Güth JF; Runkel C; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Keul C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 27406138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study.
Andriessen FS; Rijkens DR; van der Meer WJ; Wismeijer DW
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 24210732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro.
Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners.
Lee JJ; Jeong ID; Park JY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 27666500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study.
Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 26794703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Attin T; Mehl A
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1495-504. PubMed ID: 26547869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study.
Patzelt SB; Lamprinos C; Stampf S; Att W
J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Jun; 145(6):542-51. PubMed ID: 24878708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems].
Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 27636766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method.
Nagy Z; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans Z; Renne W; Vág J
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32264943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies.
Dietrich CA; Ender A; Baumgartner S; Mehl A
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 28459285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
