These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Presbyopic LASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatments. Luger MH; McAlinden C; Buckhurst PJ; Wolffsohn JS; Verma S; Arba Mosquera S Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 160(3):493-505. PubMed ID: 26025425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of small aperture implants providing increased depth of focus in pseudophakic eyes. Eppig T; Spira C; Seitz B; Szentmáry N; Langenbucher A Z Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 26(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 27017516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Monovision with a Bifocal Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens in Presbyopic Patients: A Prospective, Observational Case Series. Chang JSM; Liu SCT; Ng JCM; Ma PL Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 212():105-115. PubMed ID: 31765626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optical modeling of a corneal inlay in real eyes to increase depth of focus: optimum centration and residual defocus. Tabernero J; Artal P J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Feb; 38(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 22177883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Small-aperture strategies for the correction of presbyopia. Dick HB Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 30(4):236-242. PubMed ID: 31033734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses. Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus lenses and a blend approach of extended depth of focus lenses and bifocal lenses in cataract patients. Xiong T; Chen H; Fan W BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):476. PubMed ID: 37990306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Wright KW; Guemes A; Kapadia MS; Wilson SE J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Feb; 25(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9951661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Binocular accommodative response with extended depth of focus under controlled convergences. Lyu J; Ng CJ; Bang SP; Yoon G J Vis; 2021 Aug; 21(8):21. PubMed ID: 34415998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Subjective through-focus quality of vision with various versions of modified monovision. Vandermeer G; Rio D; Gicquel JJ; Pisella PJ; Legras R Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 99(7):997-1003. PubMed ID: 25631484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Correction of presbyopia with a small aperture corneal inlay. Waring GO J Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 27(11):842-5. PubMed ID: 22045576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of conventional versus crossed monovision in pseudophakia. Kim J; Shin HJ; Kim HC; Shin KC Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 99(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 25287366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Sensitivity of Clinical Outcomes to Centration on the Light-Constricted Pupil for a Shape-Changing Corneal Inlay. Barragán-Garza E; Koch DD; Vargas LG; Lang A; Roy A J Refract Surg; 2018 Mar; 34(3):164-170. PubMed ID: 29522225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Visual quality after monovision correction by laser in situ keratomileusis in presbyopic patients. Alarcón A; Anera RG; Villa C; Jiménez del Barco L; Gutierrez R J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1629-35. PubMed ID: 21752590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens. Beiko GHH J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jan; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23098630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]