357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25361373)
1. Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: 10- to 16-year follow-up.
McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
Orthopedics; 2014 Nov; 37(11):e975-7. PubMed ID: 25361373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Sculco PK; Poultsides LA; Gasparini G
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2193-8. PubMed ID: 27172865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up.
DeFrancesco CJ; Canseco JA; Nelson CL; Israelite CL; Kamath AF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(10):865-870. PubMed ID: 29762282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.
Peters CL; Hennessey R; Barden RM; Galante JO; Rosenberg AG
J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 9458255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty.
Duffy GP; Berry DJ; Rand JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Nov; (356):66-72. PubMed ID: 9917669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Revision knee arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening].
Rozkydal Z; Janík P; Janícek P; Kunovský R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17331449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Chalmers BP; Desy NM; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1565-1570. PubMed ID: 28109761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncemented tantalum metal components versus cemented tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: 11- to 15-year outcomes of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Hampton M; Mansoor J; Getty J; Sutton PM
Bone Joint J; 2020 Aug; 102-B(8):1025-1032. PubMed ID: 32731836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular cemented stems: long-term follow-up.
Mabry TM; Vessely MB; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):100-5. PubMed ID: 17823026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osteolysis in a surface-cemented, primary, modular Freeman-Samuelson total knee replacement.
Arora J; Ogden AC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Nov; 87(11):1502-6. PubMed ID: 16260667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and radiographic results of 184 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties placed with modular cementless stems.
Peters CL; Erickson JA; Gililland JM
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):48-53. PubMed ID: 19553076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary meniscal-bearing knee replacements: 8- to 15-year followup.
Hartford JM; Harned ME; Kaufer H; Dobner JJ; Nicholls PJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():227-31. PubMed ID: 17828026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases.
Nakama GY; Peccin MS; Almeida GJ; Lira Neto Ode A; Queiroz AA; Navarro RD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD006193. PubMed ID: 23076921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seventeen to Twenty Years of Follow-Up of the Low Contact Stress Rotating-Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty With a Cementless Tibia in All Cases.
McMahon SE; Doran E; O'Brien S; Cassidy RS; Boldt JG; Beverland DE
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Mar; 34(3):508-512. PubMed ID: 30553560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design : five to eight-year follow-up.
O'Rourke MR; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Aug; 84(8):1362-71. PubMed ID: 12177266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study.
Callaghan JJ; Squire MW; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 May; 82(5):705-11. PubMed ID: 10819281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low contact stress mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty: results at 5 to 13 years.
Hartford JM; Hunt T; Kaufer H
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 11740751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes at average 10 years follow-up.
Illgen R; Tueting J; Enright T; Schreibman K; McBeath A; Heiner J
J Arthroplasty; 2004 Oct; 19(7 Suppl 2):95-100. PubMed ID: 15457426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The 22 to 25-Year Survival of Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients.
Kim YH; Park JW; Jang YS
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Feb; 36(2):566-572. PubMed ID: 32843257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]