These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25361465)

  • 21. Evaluation of the accuracy of shoe fitting in older people using three-dimensional foot scanning.
    Menz HB; Auhl M; Ristevski S; Frescos N; Munteanu SE
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2014 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 24456656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Foot deformation during walking: differences between static and dynamic 3D foot morphology in developing feet.
    Barisch-Fritz B; Schmeltzpfenning T; Plank C; Grau S
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(6):921-33. PubMed ID: 24684680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new approach to children's footwear based on foot type classification.
    Mauch M; Grau S; Krauss I; Maiwald C; Horstmann T
    Ergonomics; 2009 Aug; 52(8):999-1008. PubMed ID: 19629814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Foot morphology in Spanish school children according to sex and age.
    Delgado-Abellán L; Aguado X; Jiménez-Ormeño E; Mecerreyes L; Alegre LM
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(5):787-97. PubMed ID: 24650291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stature and sex estimate using foot and shoe dimensions.
    Ozden H; Balci Y; Demirüstü C; Turgut A; Ertugrul M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):181-4. PubMed ID: 15567624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of a Footwear Sizing System in the National Football League.
    Wannop JW; Stefanyshyn DJ; Anderson RB; Coughlin MJ; Kent R
    Sports Health; 2019; 11(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 30048212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ethnic differences in forefoot shape and the determination of shoe comfort.
    Hawes MR; Sovak D; Miyashita M; Kang SJ; Yoshihuku Y; Tanaka S
    Ergonomics; 1994 Jan; 37(1):187-96. PubMed ID: 8112275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationship between footwear comfort of shoe inserts and anthropometric and sensory factors.
    Mündermann A; Stefanyshyn DJ; Nigg BM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Nov; 33(11):1939-45. PubMed ID: 11689747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Classification and mass production technique for three-quarter shoe insoles using non-weight-bearing plantar shapes.
    Sun SP; Chou YJ; Sue CC
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jul; 40(4):630-5. PubMed ID: 18620334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of foot shape variation based on the medial axis of foot outline.
    Kouchi M
    Ergonomics; 1995 Sep; 38(9):1911-20. PubMed ID: 7671866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing 3D foot scanning with conventional measurement methods.
    Lee YC; Lin G; Wang MJ
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2014; 7(1):44. PubMed ID: 25364389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Foot dimensions of elderly people with and without diabetes mellitus - a data basis for shoe design.
    Chantelau E; Gede A
    Gerontology; 2002; 48(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 12053114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of 1.2 million foot scans from North America, Europe and Asia.
    Jurca A; Žabkar J; Džeroski S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19155. PubMed ID: 31844106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 3D laser measurements of bare and shod feet during walking.
    Novak B; Možina J; Jezeršek M
    Gait Posture; 2014; 40(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24661899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relative foot size and shape to general body size in Javanese, Filipinas and Japanese with special reference to habitual footwear types.
    Ashizawa K; Kumakura C; Kusumoto A; Narasaki S
    Ann Hum Biol; 1997; 24(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 9074748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36.
    Rafiq RB; Hoque KM; Kabir MA; Ahmed S; Laird C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36502254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The three-dimensional shapes of underground coal miners' feet do not match the internal dimensions of their work boots.
    Dobson JA; Riddiford-Harland DL; Bell AF; Steele JR
    Ergonomics; 2018 Apr; 61(4):588-602. PubMed ID: 29065793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative study of foot dimension between adult male and female and evaluation of foot hazards due to using of footwear.
    Manna I; Pradhan D; Ghosh S; Kar SK; Dhara P
    J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci; 2001 Jul; 20(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 11575187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sex differences in relative foot length and perceived attractiveness of female feet: relationships among anthropometry, physique, and preference ratings.
    Voracek M; Fisher ML; Rupp B; Lucas D; Fessler DM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 2):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17879647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stature estimation from various three-dimensional anthropometric foot measurements of Taiwanese female population.
    Hsieh MC; Zhu A; Lee YC
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2022 Feb; 54():102000. PubMed ID: 34894433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.