109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25361502)
1. Analysis of structural similarity in mammograms for detection of bilateral asymmetry.
Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Rangayyan RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Feb; 34(2):662-71. PubMed ID: 25361502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
Banik S; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 30(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 20851789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of global and local region-based bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry to predict short-term breast cancer risk.
Li Y; Fan M; Cheng H; Zhang P; Zheng B; Li L
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025004. PubMed ID: 29226849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards localization of malignant sites of asymmetry across bilateral mammograms.
Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Lorusso M; Pepe ML; Natale CD; Martinelli E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Mar; 140():11-18. PubMed ID: 28254066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neighborhood Structural Similarity Mapping for the Classification of Masses in Mammograms.
Rabidas R; Midya A; Chakraborty J
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2018 May; 22(3):826-834. PubMed ID: 28622679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of asymmetry in mammograms via directional filtering with Gabor wavelets.
Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Frère AF
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Sep; 20(9):953-64. PubMed ID: 11585211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measures of radial correlation and trend for classification of breast masses in mammograms.
Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangieri F; Rangayyan RM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6490-3. PubMed ID: 24111228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Improved CAD System for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on Generalized Pseudo-Zernike Moment and Ada-DEWNN Classifier.
Singh SP; Urooj S
J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):105. PubMed ID: 26892455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applying a new bilateral mammographic density segmentation method to improve accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction.
Yan S; Wang Y; Aghaei F; Qiu Y; Zheng B
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Oct; 12(10):1819-1828. PubMed ID: 28726117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms via analysis of oriented patterns.
Rangayyan RM; Banik S; Desautels JE
J Vis Exp; 2013 Aug; (78):. PubMed ID: 24022326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new computer-aided detection scheme based on assessment of local bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry - a preliminary evaluation.
Kelder A; Zigel Y; Lederman D; Zheng B
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():6394-7. PubMed ID: 26737756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and validation of a fully automated system for detection and diagnosis of mammographic lesions.
Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangieri F; Rangayyan RM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():4667-70. PubMed ID: 25571033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets.
Benndorf M; Burnside ES; Herda C; Langer M; Kotter E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4987-96. PubMed ID: 26233224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm.
Heidari M; Khuzani AZ; Hollingsworth AB; Danala G; Mirniaharikandehei S; Qiu Y; Liu H; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035020. PubMed ID: 29239858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association between computed tissue density asymmetry in bilateral mammograms and near-term breast cancer risk.
Zheng B; Tan M; Ramalingam P; Gur D
Breast J; 2014; 20(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 24673749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measures of divergence of oriented patterns for the detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
Rangayyan RM; Banik S; Chakraborty J; Mukhopadhyay S; Desautels JE
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Jul; 8(4):527-45. PubMed ID: 23054747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A population-based tissue probability map-driven level set method for fully automated mammographic density estimations.
Kim Y; Hong BW; Kim SJ; Kim JH
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071905. PubMed ID: 24989383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
