254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25361619)
21. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Jones CM; Athanasiou T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jan; 79(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 15620907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What's under the ROC? An introduction to receiver operating characteristics curves.
Streiner DL; Cairney J
Can J Psychiatry; 2007 Feb; 52(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 17375868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation.
Tosteson AN; Begg CB
Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 3294553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves.
Carter JV; Pan J; Rai SN; Galandiuk S
Surgery; 2016 Jun; 159(6):1638-1645. PubMed ID: 26962006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An interpretation for the ROC curve and inference using GLM procedures.
Pepe MS
Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 10877289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Covariate-specific ROC curve analysis can accommodate differences between covariate subgroups in the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.
Lee J; van Es N; Takada T; Klok FA; Geersing GJ; Blume J; Bossuyt PM;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 160():14-23. PubMed ID: 37295733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
Nikoloulopoulos AK
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves: Additional flexibility by using semiparametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
Hoyer A; Kuss O
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):528-538. PubMed ID: 31231986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bayesian semiparametric estimation of covariate-dependent ROC curves.
Rodríguez A; Martínez JC
Biostatistics; 2014 Apr; 15(2):353-69. PubMed ID: 24174579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The application of medical decision making to the mass screening: the basic principles on ROC analysis].
Tsji I
Rinsho Byori; 1990 May; 38(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 2199711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves: The Basics and Beyond.
Chang PW; Newman TB
Hosp Pediatr; 2024 Jul; 14(7):e330-e334. PubMed ID: 38932727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Practical application of receiver operating characteristic curve on laboratory diagnosis].
Matsuo S; Takahashi H
Rinsho Byori; 1994 Jun; 42(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 8051801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5821-30. PubMed ID: 21158294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests.
Ma H; Bandos AI; Gur D
Biom J; 2015 Mar; 57(2):304-20. PubMed ID: 25537143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Semiparametric estimation of the relationship between ROC operating points and the test-result scale: application to the proper binormal model.
Pesce LL; Horsch K; Drukker K; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1537-48. PubMed ID: 22055797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Lehmann family of ROC curves.
Gönen M; Heller G
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(4):509-17. PubMed ID: 20354227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
Macaskill P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the difference of areas under two correlated ROC curves under density ratio model.
Zhang D; Zhang B
Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):678-96. PubMed ID: 24648388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
