193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25361895)
1. Estimation of insertion depth angle based on cochlea diameter and linear insertion depth: a prediction tool for the CI422.
Franke-Trieger A; Mürbe D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3193-9. PubMed ID: 25361895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography.
Trieger A; Schulze A; Schneider M; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 20962701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insertion depth angles of cochlear implant arrays with varying length: a temporal bone study.
Franke-Trieger A; Jolly C; Darbinjan A; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 24335932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiologic measurement of cochlea and hearing preservation rate using slim straight electrode (CI422) and round window approach.
Skarzynski H; Matusiak M; Furmanek M; Pilka A; Wlodarczyk E; Oldak M; Skarzynski PH
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2018 Oct; 38(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 30498276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes.
Escudé B; James C; Deguine O; Cochard N; Eter E; Fraysse B
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():27-33. PubMed ID: 17063008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
Boyer E; Karkas A; Attye A; Lefournier V; Escude B; Schmerber S
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Insertion Depth in Cochlear Implantation and Outcome in Residual Hearing and Vestibular Function.
Nordfalk KF; Rasmussen K; Hopp E; Bunne M; Silvola JT; Jablonski GE
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e129-37. PubMed ID: 26524566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation - a human cadaveric study.
Nateghifard K; Low D; Awofala L; Srikanthan D; Kuthubutheen J; Daly M; Chan H; Irish J; Chen J; Lin V; Le TN
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):65. PubMed ID: 31753027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode.
Aschendorff A; Briggs R; Brademann G; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):169-179. PubMed ID: 29059669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting depth of electrode insertion by cochlear measurements on computed tomography scans.
Angeli SI; Goncalves S
Laryngoscope; 2016 Jul; 126(7):1656-61. PubMed ID: 26536390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Accurate and Individualized Preoperative Estimation Method for the Linear Insertion Depth of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays Based on Computed Tomography.
Jia G; Song Z; Wu L; Sun Q; Sheng Y; Ni Y; Li H; Li W
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1036-1042. PubMed ID: 36864593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear duct length and cochlear distance on preoperative CT: imaging markers for estimating insertion depth angle of cochlear implant electrode.
Oh J; Cheon JE; Park J; Choi YH; Cho YJ; Lee S; Oh SH; Shin SM; Park SW
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 33471218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of Cochlear Implant Insertion Depth Using 2D-3D Registration of Postoperative X-Ray and Preoperative CT Images.
Liu GS; Cooperman SP; Neves CA; Blevins NH
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):e156-e161. PubMed ID: 38270174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Possibility of differentiation of cochlear electrodes in radiological measurements of the intracochlear and chorda-facial angle position.
Diogo I; Walliczeck U; Taube J; Franke N; Teymoortash A; Werner J; Güldner C
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2016 Aug; 36(4):310-316. PubMed ID: 27734984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative radiographic assessment of the Combi 40 cochlear implant.
Czerny C; Steiner E; Gstoettner W; Baumgartner WD; Imhof H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Dec; 169(6):1689-94. PubMed ID: 9393191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diversity in cochlear morphology and its influence on cochlear implant electrode position.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Snel-Bongers J; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e9-20. PubMed ID: 24196418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
