278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25362995)
1. Building robust conservation plans.
Visconti P; Joppa L
Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 25362995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans for species at risk across gradients of agricultural land use.
Robillard CM; Kerr JT
Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):837-847. PubMed ID: 27991681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A conservation planning approach to mitigate the impacts of leakage from protected area networks.
Bode M; Tulloch AI; Mills M; Venter O; Ando AW
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):765-74. PubMed ID: 25494874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficient and equitable design of marine protected areas in Fiji through inclusion of stakeholder-specific objectives in conservation planning.
Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Ban NC; Álvarez-Romero JG; Jupiter S; Adams VM
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1378-89. PubMed ID: 25916976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change.
Albert CH; Rayfield B; Dumitru M; Gonzalez A
Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1383-1396. PubMed ID: 28383758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insights from life history theory for an explicit treatment of trade-offs in conservation biology.
Charpentier A
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):738-47. PubMed ID: 25580848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trade-offs and efficiencies in optimal budget-constrained multispecies corridor networks.
Dilkina B; Houtman R; Gomes CP; Montgomery CA; McKelvey KS; Kendall K; Graves TA; Bernstein R; Schwartz MK
Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 27677418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic and ecological outcomes of flexible biodiversity offset systems.
Habib TJ; Farr DR; Schneider RR; Boutin S
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 23869724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
Sutton NJ; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial conservation planning under uncertainty: adapting to climate change risks using modern portfolio theory.
Eaton MJ; Yurek S; Haider Z; Martin J; Johnson FA; Udell BJ; Charkhgard H; Kwon C
Ecol Appl; 2019 Oct; 29(7):e01962. PubMed ID: 31243844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporating the effects of socioeconomic uncertainty into priority setting for conservation investment.
McBride MF; Wilson KA; Bode M; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1463-74. PubMed ID: 18173470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How decisions about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes.
Muscatello A; Elith J; Kujala H
Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1309-1320. PubMed ID: 33236808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Setting conservation priorities.
Wilson KA; Carwardine J; Possingham HP
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():237-64. PubMed ID: 19432651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ants as a measure of effectiveness of habitat conservation planning in southern California.
Mitrovich MJ; Matsuda T; Pease KH; Fisher RN
Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1239-48. PubMed ID: 20337686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effective conservation of an endangered frog under uncertainty.
Rose LE; Heard GW; Chee YE; Wintle BA
Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):350-61. PubMed ID: 26395969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of integrating complementarity into priority threat management.
Chadés I; Nicol S; van Leeuwen S; Walters B; Firn J; Reeson A; Martin TG; Carwardine J
Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):525-36. PubMed ID: 25362843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Software for prioritizing conservation actions based on probabilistic information.
Watts M; Klein CJ; Tulloch VJD; Carvalho SB; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1299-1308. PubMed ID: 33305882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
