These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of the bone augmentation ability of absorbable collagen sponge with that of hydroxyapatite/collagen composite. Ozawa Y; Kubota T; Yamamoto T; Tsukune N; Koshi R; Nishida T; Asano M; Sato S J Oral Sci; 2018 Dec; 60(4):514-518. PubMed ID: 30369559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects using biphasic calcium phosphate and a strontium hydroxyapatite-containing collagen membrane. Kitayama S; Wong LO; Ma L; Hao J; Kasugai S; Lang NP; Mattheos N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):e206-e214. PubMed ID: 25916272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Experimental Study on Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Polylactide-co-glycolide Membrane-Immobilized Conditioned Medium. Tsuchiya S; Ohmori M; Hara K; Fujio M; Ikeno M; Hibi H; Ueda M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1175-86. PubMed ID: 26394357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced bone regeneration with a novel synthetic bone substitute in combination with a new natural cross-linked collagen membrane: radiographic and histomorphometric study. Calvo-Guirado JL; Ramírez-Fernández MP; Maté-Sánchez JE; Bruno N; Velasquez P; de Aza PN Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Apr; 26(4):454-464. PubMed ID: 24720519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone healing with an in situ-formed bioresorbable polyethylene glycol hydrogel membrane in rabbit calvarial defects. Humber CC; Sándor GK; Davis JM; Peel SA; Brkovic BM; Kim YD; Holmes HI; Clokie CM Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):372-84. PubMed ID: 20060340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guided bone regeneration using a hydrophilic membrane made of unsintered hydroxyapatite and poly(L-lactic acid) in a rat bone-defect model. Ikumi R; Miyahara T; Akino N; Tachikawa N; Kasugai S Dent Mater J; 2018 Nov; 37(6):912-918. PubMed ID: 29962416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A feasibility study evaluating an in situ formed synthetic biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration in dogs. Jung RE; Lecloux G; Rompen E; Ramel CF; Buser D; Hammerle CH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 19191792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New nano-hydroxyapatite in bone defect regeneration: A histological study in rats. Kubasiewicz-Ross P; Hadzik J; Seeliger J; Kozak K; Jurczyszyn K; Gerber H; Dominiak M; Kunert-Keil C Ann Anat; 2017 Sep; 213():83-90. PubMed ID: 28655570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of two bioabsorbable barrier membranes on bone regeneration of standardized defects in calvarial bone: a comparative histomorphometric study in pigs. Bornstein MM; Heynen G; Bosshardt DD; Buser D J Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 80(8):1289-99. PubMed ID: 19656029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real-time-guided bone regeneration around standardized critical size calvarial defects using bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and collagen membrane with and without using tricalcium phosphate: an in vivo micro-computed tomographic and histologic experiment in rats. Al-Hezaimi K; Ramalingam S; Al-Askar M; ArRejaie AS; Nooh N; Jawad F; Aldahmash A; Atteya M; Wang CY Int J Oral Sci; 2016 Mar; 8(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27025260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Guided Bone Regeneration Between Surface-Modified and Pristine Titanium Membranes in a Rat Calvarial Model. Nguyen TD; Moon SH; Oh TJ; Seok JJ; Lee MH; Bae TS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):581-90. PubMed ID: 27183067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pure zinc membrane with degradability and osteogenesis promotion for guided bone regeneration: In vitro and in vivo studies. Guo H; Xia D; Zheng Y; Zhu Y; Liu Y; Zhou Y Acta Biomater; 2020 Apr; 106():396-409. PubMed ID: 32092431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing the bio-degradability and biocompatibility of a biogenic collagen membrane through cross-linking and zinc-doped hydroxyapatite. Wu Y; Chen S; Luo P; Deng S; Shan Z; Fang J; Liu X; Xie J; Liu R; Wu S; Wu X; Chen Z; Yeung KWK; Liu Q; Chen Z Acta Biomater; 2022 Apr; 143():159-172. PubMed ID: 35149241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of Mucograft vs Conventional Resorbable Collagen Membranes in Guided Bone Regeneration Around Standardized Calvarial Defects in Rats: An In Vivo Microcomputed Tomographic Analysis. Basudan A; Babay N; Ramalingam S; Nooh N; Al-Kindi M; Al-Rasheed A; Al-Hezaimi K Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2016; 36 Suppl():s109-21. PubMed ID: 27031625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Degradation pattern of a porcine collagen membrane in an in vivo model of guided bone regeneration. Calciolari E; Ravanetti F; Strange A; Mardas N; Bozec L; Cacchioli A; Kostomitsopoulos N; Donos N J Periodontal Res; 2018 Jun; 53(3):430-439. PubMed ID: 29446096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guided bone regeneration produced by new mineralized and reticulated collagen membranes in critical-sized rat calvarial defects. Veríssimo DM; Leitão RF; Figueiró SD; Góes JC; Lima V; Silveira CO; Brito GA Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2015 Feb; 240(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 25245073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of Mucograft vs Conventional Resorbable Collagen Membranes in Guided Bone Regeneration Around Standardized Calvarial Defects in Rats: A Histologic and Biomechanical Assessment. Ramalingam S; Basudan A; Babay N; Al-Rasheed A; Nooh N; Nagshbandi J; Aldahmash A; Atteya M; Al-Hezaimi K Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2016; 36 Suppl():s99-s107. PubMed ID: 27031638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Guided bone regeneration with tripolyphosphate cross-linked asymmetric chitosan membrane. Ma S; Chen Z; Qiao F; Sun Y; Yang X; Deng X; Cen L; Cai Q; Wu M; Zhang X; Gao P J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1603-12. PubMed ID: 25193523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]