383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25363301)
1. CAD/CAM fabrication accuracy of long- vs. short-span implant-supported FDPs.
Katsoulis J; Müller P; Mericske-Stern R; Blatz MB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Mar; 26(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 25363301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering.
Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N; Katsoulis K; Blatz MB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24289301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study.
Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Rotkina L; Zbären C; Enkling N; Blatz MB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 23025489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconium dioxide bars.
Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Yates DM; Izutani N; Enkling N; Blatz MB
Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):945-53. PubMed ID: 23890960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Alkharrat AR; Schmitter M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 29196948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture.
Karl M; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.
Obermeier M; Ristow O; Erdelt K; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):981-991. PubMed ID: 28710653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a university laboratory study.
Almasri R; Drago CJ; Siegel SC; Hardigan PC
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 21492296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Vertical Misfit of CAD/CAM Implant-Supported Titanium and Zirconia Frameworks.
da Cunha Fontoura D; de Magalhães Barros V; de Magalhães CS; Vaz RR; Moreira AN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 30231088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation and comparison of vertical marginal fit of three different types of multiunit screw-retained framework fabricated for an implant-supported prosthesis - An
Singh M; Yadav BK; Phukela SS; Ritwal P; Nagpal A; Saluja P
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 36511053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distortion of CAD-CAM-fabricated implant-fixed titanium and zirconia complete dental prosthesis frameworks.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley WA; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 28477917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of BioHPP and titanium as a framework veneered with composite resin for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Jin HY; Teng MH; Wang ZJ; Li X; Liang JY; Wang WX; Jiang S; Zhao BD
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Oct; 122(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30982624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
