These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25363575)

  • 1. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):991-6. PubMed ID: 18538991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses.
    Al Khalaf MM; Thalib L; Doi SA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 20409685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.
    Sutton AJ; Song F; Gilbody SM; Abrams KR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):421-45. PubMed ID: 11191259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
    Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold?
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.
    Simmonds M
    Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Practical considerations on detection of publication bias].
    Palma Pérez S; Delgado Rodríguez M
    Gac Sanit; 2006 Dec; 20 Suppl 3():10-6. PubMed ID: 17433196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):785-794. PubMed ID: 29141096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias].
    Nolting A; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):670-6. PubMed ID: 23200211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
    Saveleva E; Selinski S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
    Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study.
    Bürkner PC; Doebler P
    Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(18):3061-77. PubMed ID: 24753050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.