These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25363849)
1. Interchangeability between Pentacam and IOLMaster in phakic intraocular lens calculation. Sayed KM; Alsamman AH Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 25363849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster. Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anterior chamber depth measurement in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. Su PF; Lo AY; Hu CY; Chang SW Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1193-200. PubMed ID: 19050474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements. Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of measurements and calculated lens power using three biometers: a Scheimpflug tomographer with partial coherence interferometry and two swept source optical coherence tomographers. Ang RET; Estolano BL; Luz PHC; Umali MIN; Araneta MMQ; Cruz EM BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep; 24(1):410. PubMed ID: 39300358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the postoperative refractive predictability of Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 500 after a multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Andrade Junior N; Hida WT; Messias AMV; Lyra JM; Silva CAM; Alves MR Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2020; 83(2):141-145. PubMed ID: 32159594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation using different methods in eyes with implantable collamer lenses. Salouti R; Nazarpour-Servak M; Salouti K; Ghoreyshi M; Nowroozzadeh MH Sci Rep; 2024 Oct; 14(1):24006. PubMed ID: 39402184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of pupil dilation on biometry measurements with partial coherence interferometry and its effect on IOL power formula calculation. Rodriguez-Raton A; Jimenez-Alvarez M; Arteche-Limousin L; Mediavilla-Peña E; Larrucea-Martinez I Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25655597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A model for predicting sulcus-to-sulcus diameter in posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens candidates: correlation between ocular biometric parameters. Ghoreishi M; Abdi-Shahshahani M; Peyman A; Pourazizi M Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 39(3):661-666. PubMed ID: 29468555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurements using three imaging technologies in normal eyes and after phakic intraocular lens implantation. Doors M; Cruysberg LP; Berendschot TT; de Brabander J; Verbakel F; Webers CA; Nuijts RM Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 247(8):1139-46. PubMed ID: 19404662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interchangeability among five devices that measure anterior eye distances. Domínguez-Vicent A; Pérez-Vives C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R Clin Exp Optom; 2015 May; 98(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 25786342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes. Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer. Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Corneal Diameter and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements Using 4 Different Devices. Shajari M; Lehmann UC; Kohnen T Cornea; 2016 Jun; 35(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 27100654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation. Pereira JMM; Neves A; Alfaiate P; Santos M; Aragão H; Sousa JC Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 29788776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of astigmatism prediction error taken with the Pentacam measurements, Baylor nomogram, and Barrett formula for toric intraocular lens implantation. Park DY; Lim DH; Hwang S; Hyun J; Chung TY BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):156. PubMed ID: 28836956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses. Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer. Tañá-Rivero P; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Tello-Elordi C; Pastor-Pascual F; Montés-Micó R J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Apr; 47(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 33252569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of cycloplegia on the lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry. Huang J; McAlinden C; Su B; Pesudovs K; Feng Y; Hua Y; Yang F; Pan C; Zhou H; Wang Q Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1691-6. PubMed ID: 23160440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]