These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25364851)

  • 21. [Development of computer aided forming techniques in manufacturing scaffolds for bone tissue engineering].
    Wei X; Dong F
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 25(12):1508-12. PubMed ID: 22242356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Geometry Design Optimization of Functionally Graded Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Mechanobiological Approach.
    Boccaccio A; Uva AE; Fiorentino M; Mori G; Monno G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146935. PubMed ID: 26771746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Structural and vascular analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds, Part 2: Topology optimisation.
    Almeida HA; Bártolo PJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 868():209-36. PubMed ID: 22692613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Numerical optimization of open-porous bone scaffold structures to match the elastic properties of human cortical bone.
    Wieding J; Wolf A; Bader R
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Sep; 37():56-68. PubMed ID: 24942627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Virtual topological optimisation of scaffolds for rapid prototyping.
    Almeida Hde A; Bártolo PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Sep; 32(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 20620093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-aided tissue engineering: benefiting from the control over scaffold micro-architecture.
    Tarawneh AM; Wettergreen M; Liebschner MA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 868():1-25. PubMed ID: 22692601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering.
    Hollister SJ
    Nat Mater; 2005 Jul; 4(7):518-24. PubMed ID: 16003400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering.
    Byrne DP; Lacroix D; Planell JA; Kelly DJ; Prendergast PJ
    Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(36):5544-54. PubMed ID: 17897712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Engineering craniofacial scaffolds.
    Hollister SJ; Lin CY; Saito E; Lin CY; Schek RD; Taboas JM; Williams JM; Partee B; Flanagan CL; Diggs A; Wilke EN; Van Lenthe GH; Müller R; Wirtz T; Das S; Feinberg SE; Krebsbach PH
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2005 Aug; 8(3):162-73. PubMed ID: 16022718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Permeability analysis of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
    Dias MR; Fernandes PR; Guedes JM; Hollister SJ
    J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(6):938-44. PubMed ID: 22365847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT.
    Jones AC; Arns CH; Sheppard AP; Hutmacher DW; Milthorpe BK; Knackstedt MA
    Biomaterials; 2007 May; 28(15):2491-504. PubMed ID: 17335896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional nanocomposite scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering for bone tissue engineering.
    Duan B; Wang M; Zhou WY; Cheung WL; Li ZY; Lu WW
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Dec; 6(12):4495-505. PubMed ID: 20601244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using different unit-cell geometries to generate bone tissue scaffolds by additive manufacturing technology.
    Hossein Ehsani A; Rahmati S; Nikkhoo M; Etemadi Haghighi S; Haghpanahi M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Jun; 236(6):896-908. PubMed ID: 35592937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A novel bone scaffold design approach based on shape function and all-hexahedral mesh refinement.
    Cai S; Xi J; Chua CK
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 868():45-55. PubMed ID: 22692603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Numerical Study of Granular Scaffold Efficiency to Convert Fluid Flow into Mechanical Stimulation in Bone Tissue Engineering.
    Cruel M; Bensidhoum M; Nouguier-Lehon C; Dessombz O; Becquart P; Petite H; Hoc T
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2015 Sep; 21(9):863-71. PubMed ID: 25634115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biocompatibility evaluation of nano-rod hydroxyapatite/gelatin coated with nano-HAp as a novel scaffold using mesenchymal stem cells.
    Zandi M; Mirzadeh H; Mayer C; Urch H; Eslaminejad MB; Bagheri F; Mivehchi H
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Mar; 92(4):1244-55. PubMed ID: 19322878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration.
    Adachi T; Osako Y; Tanaka M; Hojo M; Hollister SJ
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jul; 27(21):3964-72. PubMed ID: 16584771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bioprinting endothelial cells with alginate for 3D tissue constructs.
    Khalil S; Sun W
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Nov; 131(11):111002. PubMed ID: 20353253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scaffold microarchitecture determines internal bone directional growth structure: a numerical study.
    Sanz-Herrera JA; Doblaré M; García-Aznar JM
    J Biomech; 2010 Sep; 43(13):2480-6. PubMed ID: 20542275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering.
    Williams JM; Adewunmi A; Schek RM; Flanagan CL; Krebsbach PH; Feinberg SE; Hollister SJ; Das S
    Biomaterials; 2005 Aug; 26(23):4817-27. PubMed ID: 15763261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.