190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25364852)
21. Patient-specific hemodynamic analysis of small internal carotid artery-ophthalmic artery aneurysms.
Chien A; Tateshima S; Sayre J; Castro M; Cebral J; Viñuela F
Surg Neurol; 2009 Nov; 72(5):444-50; discussion 450. PubMed ID: 19329152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prediction of rupture risk in cerebral aneurysms by comparing clinical cases with fluid-structure interaction analyses.
Cho KC; Yang H; Kim JJ; Oh JH; Kim YB
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):18237. PubMed ID: 33106591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An Automated Workflow for Hemodynamic Computations in Cerebral Aneurysms.
Nita CI; Suzuki T; Itu LM; Mihalef V; Takao H; Murayama Y; Sharma P; Redel T; Rapaka S
Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():5954617. PubMed ID: 32655681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cerebral blood flow in a healthy Circle of Willis and two intracranial aneurysms: computational fluid dynamics versus four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.
Berg P; Stucht D; Janiga G; Beuing O; Speck O; Thévenin D
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24292415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computational Fluid Dynamics to Evaluate the Management of a Giant Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm.
Russin J; Babiker H; Ryan J; Rangel-Castilla L; Frakes D; Nakaji P
World Neurosurg; 2015 Jun; 83(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 25541083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm.
Steinman DA; Milner JS; Norley CJ; Lownie SP; Holdsworth DW
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Apr; 24(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 12695182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Experimental and CFD flow studies in an intracranial aneurysm model with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.
Frolov SV; Sindeev SV; Liepsch D; Balasso A
Technol Health Care; 2016 May; 24(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 26835725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study of WEB-treated aneurysms: Can CFD predict WEB "compression" during follow-up?
Caroff J; Mihalea C; Da Ros V; Yagi T; Iacobucci M; Ikka L; Moret J; Spelle L
J Neuroradiol; 2017 Jul; 44(4):262-268. PubMed ID: 28478112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CFD: computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination? The role of hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment.
Xiang J; Tutino VM; Snyder KV; Meng H
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1849-57. PubMed ID: 24029393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hemodynamic Differences in Intracranial Aneurysms before and after Rupture.
Cornelissen BM; Schneiders JJ; Potters WV; van den Berg R; Velthuis BK; Rinkel GJ; Slump CH; VanBavel E; Majoie CB; Marquering HA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Oct; 36(10):1927-33. PubMed ID: 26089313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Additional Value of Intra-Aneurysmal Hemodynamics in Discriminating Ruptured versus Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.
Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; van Ooij P; van den Berg R; Nederveen AJ; Verbaan D; Vandertop WP; Pourquie M; Rinkel GJ; vanBavel E; Majoie CB
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Oct; 36(10):1920-6. PubMed ID: 26206812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing the Hemodynamics in Residual Cavities of Intracranial Aneurysm after Coil Embolization with Combined Computational Flow Dynamics and Silent Magnetic Resonance Angiography.
Suzuki T; Genkai N; Nomura T; Abe H
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2020 Dec; 29(12):105290. PubMed ID: 32992205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of hemodynamic factors on rupture of intracranial aneurysms: patient-specific 3D mirror aneurysms model computational fluid dynamics simulation.
Lu G; Huang L; Zhang XL; Wang SZ; Hong Y; Hu Z; Geng DY
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2011 Aug; 32(7):1255-61. PubMed ID: 21757526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Association of hemodynamic characteristics and cerebral aneurysm rupture.
Cebral JR; Mut F; Weir J; Putman CM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2011 Feb; 32(2):264-70. PubMed ID: 21051508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Discrimination of intracranial aneurysm rupture status: patient-specific inflow boundary may not be a must-have condition in hemodynamic simulations.
Li W; Wang S; Tian Z; Zhu W; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang K; Yang X; Liu J
Neuroradiology; 2020 Nov; 62(11):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 32588092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.
Ford MD; Nikolov HN; Milner JS; Lownie SP; Demont EM; Kalata W; Loth F; Holdsworth DW; Steinman DA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021015. PubMed ID: 18412502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A study of wall shear stress in 12 aneurysms with respect to different viscosity models and flow conditions.
Evju Ø; Valen-Sendstad K; Mardal KA
J Biomech; 2013 Nov; 46(16):2802-8. PubMed ID: 24099744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Using Morphological and Hemodynamic Biomarkers Evaluated from Magnetic Resonance Fluid Dynamics and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Perera R; Isoda H; Ishiguro K; Mizuno T; Takehara Y; Terada M; Tanoi C; Naito T; Sakahara H; Hiramatsu H; Namba H; Izumi T; Wakabayashi T; Kosugi T; Onishi Y; Alley M; Komori Y; Ikeda M; Naganawa S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Dec; 19(4):333-344. PubMed ID: 31956175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computational study for the effects of coil configuration on blood flow characteristics in coil-embolized cerebral aneurysm.
Otani T; Ii S; Shigematsu T; Fujinaka T; Hirata M; Ozaki T; Wada S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 May; 55(5):697-710. PubMed ID: 27444298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling of contrast transport in basilar aneurysms following flow-altering surgeries.
Vali A; Abla AA; Lawton MT; Saloner D; Rayz VL
J Biomech; 2017 Jan; 50():195-201. PubMed ID: 27890537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
