190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25364852)
41. Hemodynamic and morphological characteristics of a growing cerebral aneurysm.
Dabagh M; Nair P; Gounley J; Frakes D; Gonzalez LF; Randles A
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Jul; 47(1):E13. PubMed ID: 31261117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis and Correlation with Intraoperative Aneurysm Features.
Feletti A; Wang X; Talari S; Mewada T; Mamadaliev D; Tanaka R; Yamada Y; Kei Y; Suyama D; Kawase T; Kato Y
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2018; 129():3-9. PubMed ID: 30171307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Computational fluid dynamics as a risk assessment tool for aneurysm rupture.
Murayama Y; Fujimura S; Suzuki T; Takao H
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Jul; 47(1):E12. PubMed ID: 31261116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Current status of computational fluid dynamics for cerebral aneurysms: the clinician's perspective.
Wong GK; Poon WS
J Clin Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 18(10):1285-8. PubMed ID: 21795051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. 4D-CT angiography versus 3D-rotational angiography as the imaging modality for computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysms.
Cancelliere NM; Najafi M; Brina O; Bouillot P; Vargas MI; Lovblad KO; Krings T; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
J Neurointerv Surg; 2020 Jun; 12(6):626-630. PubMed ID: 31772042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Inflow Hemodynamics of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics and 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Misaki K; Futami K; Uno T; Nambu I; Yoshikawa A; Kamide T; Nakada M
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 May; 30(5):105685. PubMed ID: 33662703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Predictive modeling and in vivo assessment of cerebral blood flow in the management of complex cerebral aneurysms.
Walcott BP; Reinshagen C; Stapleton CJ; Choudhri O; Rayz V; Saloner D; Lawton MT
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2016 Jun; 36(6):998-1003. PubMed ID: 27009946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Extending statistical learning for aneurysm rupture assessment to Finnish and Japanese populations using morphology, hemodynamics, and patient characteristics.
Detmer FJ; Hadad S; Chung BJ; Mut F; Slawski M; Juchler N; Kurtcuoglu V; Hirsch S; Bijlenga P; Uchiyama Y; Fujimura S; Yamamoto M; Murayama Y; Takao H; Koivisto T; Frösen J; Cebral JR
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Jul; 47(1):E16. PubMed ID: 31261120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Detection of Hemodynamic Characteristics Before Growth in Growing Cerebral Aneurysms by Analyzing Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Images Alone: Preliminary Results.
Kimura H; Hayashi K; Taniguchi M; Hosoda K; Fujita A; Seta T; Tomiyama A; Kohmura E
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e1439-e1448. PubMed ID: 30465954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Quantitative hemodynamic analysis of brain aneurysms at different locations.
Chien A; Castro MA; Tateshima S; Sayre J; Cebral J; Viñuela F
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Sep; 30(8):1507-12. PubMed ID: 19406766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Virtual stenting of intracranial aneurysms: application of hemodynamic modification analysis.
Song Y; Choe J; Liu H; Park KJ; Yu H; Lim OK; Kim H; Park D; Ge J; Suh DC
Acta Radiol; 2016 Aug; 57(8):992-7. PubMed ID: 26503958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Flow Dynamics of Aneurysm Growth and Rupture: Challenges for the Development of Computational Flow Dynamics as a Diagnostic Tool to Detect Rupture-Prone Aneurysms.
Frösen J
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2016; 123():89-95. PubMed ID: 27637634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comprehensive validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of in-vivo blood flow in patient-specific cerebral aneurysms.
Sun Q; Groth A; Aach T
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):742-54. PubMed ID: 22320784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Temporal variations of wall shear stress parameters in intracranial aneurysms--importance of patient-specific inflow waveforms for CFD calculations.
Karmonik C; Yen C; Diaz O; Klucznik R; Grossman RG; Benndorf G
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Aug; 152(8):1391-8; discussion 1398. PubMed ID: 20390310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. How patient-specific do internal carotid artery inflow rates need to be for computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysms?
Najafi M; Cancelliere NM; Brina O; Bouillot P; Vargas MI; Delattre BM; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
J Neurointerv Surg; 2021 May; 13(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 32732256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Computational Fluid Dynamics in Cerebral Aneurysms-Explaining the Aneurysm's Shape and the Timing of Rupture with Theoretical Physics.
Ansari A
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():591-592. PubMed ID: 30930315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of an anterior communicating artery ruptured during angiography.
Hodis S; Uthamaraj S; Lanzino G; Kallmes DF; Dragomir-Daescu D
BMJ Case Rep; 2013 Mar; 2013():. PubMed ID: 23475991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Hemodynamics at the ostium of cerebral aneurysms with relation to post-treatment changes by a virtual flow diverter: a computational fluid dynamics study.
Karmonik C; Chintalapani G; Redel T; Zhang YJ; Diaz O; Klucznik R; Grossman RG
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1895-8. PubMed ID: 24110082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Sensitivity of CFD based hemodynamic results in rabbit aneurysm models to idealizations in surrounding vasculature.
Zeng Z; Kallmes DF; Durka MJ; Ding Y; Lewis D; Kadirvel R; Robertson AM
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Sep; 132(9):091009. PubMed ID: 20815643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Biology and hemodynamics of aneurismal vasculopathies.
Pereira VM; Brina O; Gonzalez AM; Narata AP; Ouared R; Karl-Olof L
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1606-17. PubMed ID: 23347588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
