These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25364951)
1. Tablet, web-based, or paper questionnaires for measuring anxiety in patients suspected of breast cancer: patients' preferences and quality of collected data. Barentsz MW; Wessels H; van Diest PJ; Pijnappel RM; Haaring C; van der Pol CC; Witkamp AJ; van den Bosch MA; Verkooijen HM J Med Internet Res; 2014 Oct; 16(10):e239. PubMed ID: 25364951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response rates for patient-reported outcomes using web-based versus paper questionnaires: comparison of two invitational methods in older colorectal cancer patients. Horevoorts NJ; Vissers PA; Mols F; Thong MS; van de Poll-Franse LV J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e111. PubMed ID: 25953059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In a randomized controlled trial, patients preferred electronic data collection of breast cancer risk-factor information in a mammography setting. Aiello EJ; Taplin S; Reid R; Hobbs M; Seger D; Kamel H; Tufano J; Ballard-Barbash R J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 16360564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia. Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient preference: a comparison of electronic patient-completed questionnaires with paper among cancer patients. Martin P; Brown MC; Espin-Garcia O; Cuffe S; Pringle D; Mahler M; Villeneuve J; Niu C; Charow R; Lam C; Shani RM; Hon H; Otsuka M; Xu W; Alibhai S; Jenkinson J; Liu G Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2016 Mar; 25(2):334-41. PubMed ID: 25899560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost. Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using web-based and paper-based questionnaires for collecting data on fertility issues among female childhood cancer survivors: differences in response characteristics. van den Berg MH; Overbeek A; van der Pal HJ; Versluys AB; Bresters D; van Leeuwen FE; Lambalk CB; Kaspers GJ; van Dulmen-den Broeder E J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e76. PubMed ID: 21955527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-Based Data Collection for Older Adults Living With HIV in a Clinical Research Setting: Pilot Observational Study. Tassiopoulos K; Roberts-Toler C; Fichtenbaum CJ; Koletar SL J Med Internet Res; 2020 Nov; 22(11):e18588. PubMed ID: 33174854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. Kongsved SM; Basnov M; Holm-Christensen K; Hjollund NH J Med Internet Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):e25. PubMed ID: 17942387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of quality of life using a tablet PC-based survey in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: a multi-institutional prospective randomized crossover comparison of paper and tablet PC-based questionnaires (KROG 12-01). Kim H; Park HC; Yoon SM; Kim TH; Kim J; Kang MK; Jung J; Kim SW; Yea JW; Park SH; Park YS Support Care Cancer; 2016 Oct; 24(10):4399-406. PubMed ID: 27220523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of tablet personal computers for sensitive patient-reported information. Dupont A; Wheeler J; Herndon JE; Coan A; Zafar SY; Hood L; Patwardhan M; Shaw HS; Lyerly HK; Abernethy AP J Support Oncol; 2009; 7(3):91-7. PubMed ID: 19507456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home. Wintner LM; Giesinger JM; Zabernigg A; Rumpold G; Sztankay M; Oberguggenberger AS; Gamper EM; Holzner B BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Dec; 15():110. PubMed ID: 26699708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: a mixed-mode survey with a Nordic perspective. Hohwü L; Lyshol H; Gissler M; Jonsson SH; Petzold M; Obel C J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e173. PubMed ID: 23978658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The patient perspective on the use of information and communication technologies and e-health in rehabilitation. Wentink MM; Prieto E; de Kloet AJ; Vliet Vlieland TPM; Meesters JJL Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Oct; 13(7):620-625. PubMed ID: 28758806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires. Richter JG; Becker A; Koch T; Nixdorf M; Willers R; Monser R; Schacher B; Alten R; Specker C; Schneider M Ann Rheum Dis; 2008 Dec; 67(12):1739-41. PubMed ID: 18647853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing effects in regular practice of e-communication and Web-based self-management support among breast cancer patients: preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial. Børøsund E; Cvancarova M; Moore SM; Ekstedt M; Ruland CM J Med Internet Res; 2014 Dec; 16(12):e295. PubMed ID: 25525672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internet-administered Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaires Compared With Pen and Paper in an Adolescent Scoliosis Population: A Randomized Crossover Study. Nitikman M; Mulpuri K; Reilly CW J Pediatr Orthop; 2017 Mar; 37(2):e75-e79. PubMed ID: 26756988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial. Wallwiener M; Matthies L; Simoes E; Keilmann L; Hartkopf AD; Sokolov AN; Walter CB; Sickenberger N; Wallwiener S; Feisst M; Gass P; Fasching PA; Lux MP; Wallwiener D; Taran FA; Rom J; Schneeweiss A; Graf J; Brucker SY J Med Internet Res; 2017 Sep; 19(9):e322. PubMed ID: 28912116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Survey of pain after ambulatory surgery: An internet-based instrument]. Schwarze C; Zenz D; Orlowski O; Wempe C; Van Aken H; Zahn P; Maier C; Pogatzki-Zahn EM Schmerz; 2016 Apr; 30(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 26541856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]