These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25365036)

  • 1. Automatic personality assessment through social media language.
    Park G; Schwartz HA; Eichstaedt JC; Kern ML; Kosinski M; Stillwell DJ; Ungar LH; Seligman ME
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Jun; 108(6):934-52. PubMed ID: 25365036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The online social self: an open vocabulary approach to personality.
    Kern ML; Eichstaedt JC; Schwartz HA; Dziurzynski L; Ungar LH; Stillwell DJ; Kosinski M; Ramones SM; Seligman ME
    Assessment; 2014 Apr; 21(2):158-69. PubMed ID: 24322010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associations between informant ratings of personality disorder traits, self-reports of personality, and directly observed behavior.
    Kaurin A; Sauerberger KS; Funder DC
    J Pers; 2018 Dec; 86(6):1078-1101. PubMed ID: 29498425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychiatric patient- and informant-reported personality: predicting concurrent and future behavior.
    Ready RE; Watson D; Clark LA
    Assessment; 2002 Dec; 9(4):361-72. PubMed ID: 12462756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Latent human traits in the language of social media: An open-vocabulary approach.
    Kulkarni V; Kern ML; Stillwell D; Kosinski M; Matz S; Ungar L; Skiena S; Schwartz HA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0201703. PubMed ID: 30485276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The incremental validity of average state self-reports over global self-reports of personality.
    Finnigan KM; Vazire S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Aug; 115(2):321-337. PubMed ID: 28277717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: predictions of behavioral acts, informant reports, and clinical indicators.
    Grucza RA; Goldberg LR
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Oct; 89(2):167-87. PubMed ID: 17764394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self- and other-reports of traits from the five-factor model: relations to personality disorder.
    Miller JD; Pilkonis PA; Clifton A
    J Pers Disord; 2005 Aug; 19(4):400-19. PubMed ID: 16178682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Convergence of Self-Reports and Informant Reports on the Personality Assessment Screener.
    Kelley SE; Edens JF; Morey LC
    Assessment; 2017 Dec; 24(8):999-1007. PubMed ID: 26951323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Construct validity of adolescents' self-reported big five personality traits: importance of conceptual breadth and initial validation of a short measure.
    Morizot J
    Assessment; 2014 Oct; 21(5):580-606. PubMed ID: 24619971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acquaintance ratings of the Big Five personality traits: incremental validity beyond and interactive effects with self-reports in the prediction of workplace deviance.
    Kluemper DH; McLarty BD; Bing MN
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Jan; 100(1):237-48. PubMed ID: 25198097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [French validation of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale].
    Bouvet R; Djeriouat H; Goutaudier N; Py J; Chabrol H
    Encephale; 2014 Sep; 40(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 24836860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Spanish version of the Wisconsin Personality Disorders Inventory-IV (WISPI-IV): tests of validity and reliability.
    Smith TL; Klein MH; Alonso C; Salazar-Fraile J; Felipe-Castaño E; Moreno CL; Acosta SR; Rios LI; Martí-Sanjuán V
    J Pers Disord; 2011 Dec; 25(6):813-33. PubMed ID: 22217227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychopathic traits and externalizing behaviors: a comparison of self- and informant reports in the statistical prediction of externalizing behaviors.
    Jones S; Miller JD
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Mar; 24(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 21875220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correspondence of psychiatric patient and informant ratings of personality traits, temperament, and interpersonal problems.
    Ready RE; Clark LA
    Psychol Assess; 2002 Mar; 14(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 11911048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans.
    Youyou W; Kosinski M; Stillwell D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jan; 112(4):1036-40. PubMed ID: 25583507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the big five dimensions? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7.
    Measelle JR; John OP; Ablow JC; Cowan PA; Cowan CP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Jul; 89(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 16060748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: a meta-analysis.
    Oh IS; Wang G; Mount MK
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jul; 96(4):762-73. PubMed ID: 21142341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards understanding assessments of the big five: multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer.
    Biesanz JC; West SG
    J Pers; 2004 Aug; 72(4):845-76. PubMed ID: 15210019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the validity of informant and self-reports of personality using laboratory indices of emotional responding as criterion variables.
    Lieberman L; Liu H; Huggins AA; Katz AC; Zvolensky MJ; Shankman SA
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Sep; 53(9):1386-97. PubMed ID: 27273802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.