These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25365474)

  • 1. Influence of the HCR-20, LS/CMI, and PCL-R on decisions about parole suitability among lifers.
    Guy LS; Kusaj C; Packer IK; Douglas KS
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):232-43. PubMed ID: 25365474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do parole board members in England and Wales construct decisions about whether to release perpetrators of intimate partner violence from prison?
    Dyke C; Schucan Bird K; Rivas C
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2020 Dec; 30(6):350-362. PubMed ID: 33191534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Waiving away the chance of freedom: exploring why prisoners decide against applying for parole.
    Best BL; Wodahl EJ; Holmes MD
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2014 Mar; 58(3):320-47. PubMed ID: 23264350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of the Historical, Clinical and Risk Management Scales (HCR-20) in predicting violence and other offenses in forensic psychiatric patients in Brazil.
    Telles LE; Folino JO; Taborda JG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(5-6):427-31. PubMed ID: 23021023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is death row obsolete? A decade of mainstreaming death-sentenced inmates in Missouri.
    Cunningham MD; Reidy TJ; Sorensen JR
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(3):307-20. PubMed ID: 15968709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mental illness, criminal risk factors and parole release decisions.
    Matejkowski J; Draine J; Solomon P; Salzer MS
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):528-53. PubMed ID: 21755531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does Prison Crowding Predict Higher Rates of Substance Use Related Parole Violations? A Recurrent Events Multi-Level Survival Analysis.
    Ruderman MA; Wilson DF; Reid S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0141328. PubMed ID: 26492490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of assessing people experiencing mental illness who have offended using the Camberwell Assessment of Need-Forensic and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales-Secure.
    Abou-Sinna R; Luebbers S
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2012 Oct; 21(5):462-70. PubMed ID: 22583655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Release or Denial: Evaluating the Roles of Emotion and Risk in Parole Decisions.
    Yelderman LA; Estrada-Reynolds V; Lawrence TI
    Psychol Rep; 2022 Aug; 125(4):2088-2108. PubMed ID: 33845670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An actuarial model for assessment of prison violence risk among maximum security inmates.
    Cunningham MD; Sorensen JR; Reidy TJ
    Assessment; 2005 Mar; 12(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 15695742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive validity of the PCL-R for offenders with intellectual disability in a high security hospital: treatment progress.
    Morrissey C; Mooney P; Hogue TE; Lindsay WR; Taylor JL
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2007 Jun; 32(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 17613683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental Health Risk Factors and Parole Decisions: Does Inmate Mental Health Status Affect Who Gets Released.
    Houser KA; Vîlcică ER; Saum CA; Hiller ML
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31426341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing risk for violence among male and female civil psychiatric patients: the HCR-20, PCL:SV, and VSC.
    Nicholls TL; Ogloff JR; Douglas KS
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 14963884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An update and expansion on the role of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide and Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 in United States case law.
    Cox J; Fairfax-Columbo J; DeMatteo D; Vitacco MJ; Kopkin MR; Parrott CT; Bownes E
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):517-531. PubMed ID: 30277618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parole release decisions: impact of positive and negative victim and nonvictim input on a representative sample of parole-eligible inmates.
    Caplan JM
    Violence Vict; 2010; 25(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 20514818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recidivism in female offenders: PCL-R lifestyle factor and VRAG show predictive validity in a German sample.
    Eisenbarth H; Osterheider M; Nedopil N; Stadtland C
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(5):575-84. PubMed ID: 22718134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the risk factors for violence and criminality in women: the concurrent validity of the PCL-R and HCR-20.
    Warren JI; South SC; Burnette ML; Rogers A; Friend R; Bale R; Van Patten I
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2005; 28(3):269-89. PubMed ID: 15923037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four-facet PCL-R structure and cognitive functioning among high violent criminal offenders.
    Sreenivasan S; Walker SC; Weinberger LE; Kirkish P; Garrick T
    J Pers Assess; 2008 Mar; 90(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 18444114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of psychopathic personality disorder in violence risk assessments using the HCR-20.
    Guy LS; Douglas KS; Hendry MC
    J Pers Disord; 2010 Oct; 24(5):551-80. PubMed ID: 20958169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scoring subjectivity and item performance on measures used to assess violence risk: the PCL-R and HCR-20 as exemplars.
    Rufino KA; Boccaccini MT; Guy LS
    Assessment; 2011 Dec; 18(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 20685914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.