BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25365573)

  • 1. Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.
    Zhang W; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25365573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
    Koshino H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control.
    Konstantinou N; Beal E; King JR; Lavie N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1985-97. PubMed ID: 25085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual working-memory capacity load does not modulate distractor processing.
    Yao N; Guo Y; Liu Y; Shen M; Gao Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3291-3313. PubMed ID: 32529572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual short-term memory load strengthens selective attention.
    Roper ZJ; Vecera SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):549-56. PubMed ID: 24002967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load theory behind the wheel; perceptual and cognitive load effects.
    Murphy G; Greene CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 28604027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
    Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behind the scenes: how visual memory load biases selective attention during processing of visual streams.
    Klaver P; Talsma D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1133-46. PubMed ID: 24015992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions Between Modality of Working Memory Load and Perceptual Load in Distractor Processing.
    Koshino H; Olid P
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(3):135-49. PubMed ID: 26273937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Working memory distortions of duration perception are modulated by attentional tags.
    Pan Y; Hou X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Mar; 165():48-52. PubMed ID: 26922616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.
    Lavie N; Hirst A; de Fockert JW; Viding E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):339-54. PubMed ID: 15355143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Bühler M; Menz MM; Rose M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 19302005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.