239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25365727)
1. Fairness heuristics and substitutability effects: inferring the fairness of outcomes, procedures, and interpersonal treatment when employees lack clear information.
Qin X; Ren R; Zhang ZX; Johnson RE
J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):749-66. PubMed ID: 25365727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.
Brockner J; Fishman AY; Reb J; Goldman B; Spiegel S; Garden C
J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1657-71. PubMed ID: 18020803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: a moderated mediation approach.
Ambrose ML; Schminke M; Mayer DM
J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jul; 98(4):678-89. PubMed ID: 23477377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How abusive supervisors influence employees' voice and silence: the effects of interactional justice and organizational attribution.
Wang R; Jiang J
J Soc Psychol; 2015; 155(3):204-20. PubMed ID: 25492100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. It's not only what you do, but why you do it: How managerial motives influence employees' fairness judgments.
Muir Zapata CP; Sherf EN; Liu JT
J Appl Psychol; 2022 Apr; 107(4):581-603. PubMed ID: 34197139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 12500817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Justice as a dynamic construct: effects of individual trajectories on distal work outcomes.
Hausknecht JP; Sturman MC; Roberson QM
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jul; 96(4):872-80. PubMed ID: 21443314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Event justice perceptions and employees' reactions: perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator.
Choi J
J Appl Psychol; 2008 May; 93(3):513-28. PubMed ID: 18457484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Not all fairness is created equal: A study of employee attributions of supervisor justice motives.
Matta FK; Sabey TB; Scott BA; Lin SJ; Koopman J
J Appl Psychol; 2020 Mar; 105(3):274-293. PubMed ID: 31380668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined effects of uncertainty and organizational justice on employee health: testing the uncertainty management model of fairness judgments among Finnish public sector employees.
Elovainio M; van den Bos K; Linna A; Kivimäki M; Ala-Mursula L; Pentti J; Vahtera J
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 61(12):2501-12. PubMed ID: 15990210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The lives of others: Third parties' responses to others' injustice.
O'Reilly J; Aquino K; Skarlicki D
J Appl Psychol; 2016 Feb; 101(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 26214088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Organizational justice and health; review of evidence.
Elovainio M; Heponiemi T; Sinervo T; Magnavita N
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2010; 32(3 Suppl B):B5-9. PubMed ID: 21299075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Employee conscientiousness, agreeableness, and supervisor justice rule compliance: A three-study investigation.
Huang JL; Cropanzano R; Li A; Shao P; Zhang XA; Li Y
J Appl Psychol; 2017 Nov; 102(11):1564-1589. PubMed ID: 28749156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceived reciprocity and well-being at work in non-professional employees: fairness or self-interest?
Moliner C; Martínez-Tur V; Peiró JM; Ramos J; Cropanzano R
Stress Health; 2013 Feb; 29(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 22287128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why managers should care about fairness: the effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes.
Simons T; Roberson Q
J Appl Psychol; 2003 Jun; 88(3):432-43. PubMed ID: 12814293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An extension of uncertainty management theory to the self: the relationship between justice, social comparison orientation, and antisocial work behaviors.
Thau S; Aquino K; Wittek R
J Appl Psychol; 2007 Jan; 92(1):250-8. PubMed ID: 17227166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of grade level, context, and family type on male and female adolescents' distributive justice reasoning.
McGillicuddy-De Lisi AV; De Lisi R; Van Gulik K
J Adolesc; 2008 Feb; 31(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 17583786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dialectical thinking and fairness-based perspectives of affirmative action.
Hideg I; Ferris DL
J Appl Psychol; 2017 May; 102(5):782-801. PubMed ID: 28150989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coping with unfair events constructively or destructively: the effects of overall justice and self-other orientation.
Bobocel DR
J Appl Psychol; 2013 Sep; 98(5):720-31. PubMed ID: 23668596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of interactional justice on egocentric bias in resource allocation decisions.
Leung K; Tong KK; Ho SS
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 15161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
