These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25365727)

  • 21. Gender, justice and work: a distributive approach to perceptions of housework fairness.
    Perales F; Baxter J; Tai TO
    Soc Sci Res; 2015 May; 51():51-63. PubMed ID: 25769851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement.
    Ployhart RE; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 1998 Feb; 83(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9494438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ranking low, feeling high: How hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behavior in response to procedural justice.
    van Dijke M; De Cremer D; Langendijk G; Anderson C
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Feb; 103(2):164-181. PubMed ID: 28933910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trust in decision-making authorities dictates the form of the interactive relationship between outcome fairness and procedural fairness.
    Bianchi EC; Brockner J; van den Bos K; Seifert M; Moon H; van Dijke M; De Cremer D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 25387762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation.
    Ambrose ML; Schminke M
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):491-500. PubMed ID: 19271803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: a multilevel investigation.
    Loi R; Yang J; Diefendorff JM
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 May; 94(3):770-81. PubMed ID: 19450012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survivor reactions to reorganization: antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice.
    Kernan MC; Hanges PJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Oct; 87(5):916-28. PubMed ID: 12395816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Why does interactional justice promote organizational loyalty, job performance, and prevent mental impairment? The role of social support and social stressors.
    Otto K; Mamatoglu N
    J Psychol; 2015; 149(1-2):193-218. PubMed ID: 25511205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of social value orientations on fairness judgments.
    Anderson WD; Patterson ML
    J Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 148(2):223-45. PubMed ID: 18512420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Just-world reasoning in children's immanent justice judgements.
    Jose PE
    Child Dev; 1990 Aug; 61(4):1024-33. PubMed ID: 2209175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Children's social competence, academic competence, and aggressiveness as related to ability to make judgments of fairness.
    Vandiver T
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Aug; 89(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 11729530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceiving expatriate coworkers as foreigners encourages aid: social categorization and procedural justice together improve intergroup cooperation and dual identity.
    Leonardelli GJ; Toh SM
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jan; 22(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 21148458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tend to Compare and Tend to Be Fair: The Relationship between Social Comparison Sensitivity and Justice Sensitivity.
    Zhen S; Yu R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155414. PubMed ID: 27214372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of an Attributional and Distributive Justice Mediational Model on the Effects of Surface Acting on Emotional Exhaustion: An Experimental Study.
    García-Romero A; Martinez-Iñigo D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34299956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.
    De Cremer D; Tyler TR
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 17484547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differences between Caucasian and Hispanic undergraduates in emphasis on distributive, procedural, and interactional justice.
    Tata J
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Aug; 87(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 11026405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relationship between organizational justice and cyberloafing in the workplace: has "anomia" a say in the matter?
    de Lara PZ
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2007 Jun; 10(3):464-70. PubMed ID: 17594272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Justice as a dependent variable: subordinate charisma as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice perceptions.
    Scott BA; Colquitt JA; Zapata-Phelan CP
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1597-609. PubMed ID: 18020799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reactions to others' mistakes: an empirical test of fairness theory.
    Williams KJ; Nicklin JM
    J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 143(5):533-58. PubMed ID: 19943403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exploring the interactive effect of time control and justice perception on job attitudes.
    Chen Z; Zhang X; Leung K; Zhou F
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 20397593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.