233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25366248)
1. The growth of Medicare rebatable cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in Australia.
Brown LF; Monsour P
Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec; 60(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 25366248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative adoption of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography machines across Australia.
Zhang A; Critchley S; Monsour PA
Aust Dent J; 2016 Dec; 61(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 26881416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects from changes to the Medicare Benefits Schedule in 2014 on cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography scans across Australia.
Zhang A; Brown LF; Monsour PA
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Oct; 61(5):600-606. PubMed ID: 28345214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dentists' use of digital radiographic techniques: Part II - extraoral radiography: a questionnaire study of Swedish dentists.
Svenson B; Ståhlnacke K; Karlsson R; Fält A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Mar; 77(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 30422025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Irradiation provided by dental radiological procedures in a pediatric population.
Hedesiu M; Marcu M; Salmon B; Pauwels R; Oenning AC; Almasan O; Roman R; Baciut M; Jacobs R;
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 103():112-117. PubMed ID: 29803375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Clinical Decision Making among Specialists.
Rodríguez G; Abella F; Durán-Sindreu F; Patel S; Roig M
J Endod; 2017 Feb; 43(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 28132707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How do dentists use CBCT in dental clinics? A Norwegian nationwide survey.
Hol C; Hellén-Halme K; Torgersen G; Nilsson M; Møystad A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Apr; 73(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 25415368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current trends in the adoption and education of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography machines across Australia.
Lam M; Critchley S; Zhang A; Monsour P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200380. PubMed ID: 33449832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do CBCT scans alter surgical treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative surgical diagnosis using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.
Wolff C; Mücke T; Wagenpfeil S; Kanatas A; Bissinger O; Deppe H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1700-1705. PubMed ID: 27567358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of estimated age based on pulp volume from cone beam computed tomography (CT) images and panoramic radiography data with chronological age.
Polat Y; Çelenk S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Mar; 48(2):149-162. PubMed ID: 38548645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images.
Dagassan-Berndt DC; Zitzmann NU; Walter C; Schulze RK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26227397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Dental Injuries Using Intraoral Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An In Vivo Investigation.
Patel S; Puri T; Mannocci F; Navai A
J Endod; 2021 Jun; 47(6):914-923. PubMed ID: 33705831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing dental identifier charting in cone beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiographs using INTERPOL coding for human identification.
Franco A; Orestes SGF; Coimbra EF; Thevissen P; Fernandes Â
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109860. PubMed ID: 31310942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of temporal bone pneumatization: a study in vivo using cone-beam-computed tomography.
de Rezende Barbosa GL; Nascimento Mdo C; Ladeira DB; Bomtorim VV; da Cruz AD; Almeida SM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 23850158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography for mandibular morphometry.
Tassoker M; Akin D; Aydin Kabakci AD; Sener S
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2019; 78(4):862-870. PubMed ID: 30888681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The suitability of panoramic radiographs for clinical decision making regarding root angulation compared to cone-beam computed tomography.
Alqareer A; Nada R; Ghayyath A; Baghdady M; Allareddy V
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):89. PubMed ID: 34030659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcification of the stylohyoid ligament in panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography among patients referred for dental implant treatment planning.
Mahdian M; Moghaddam EJ; Alzahrani A; Rengasamy K; Tadinada A
Implant Dent; 2014 Aug; 23(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 25033348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of neighbouring teeth: a study assessing the diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in two groups of observers.
Lai CS; Suter VG; Katsaros C; Bornstein MM
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 24123189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidental Findings in Small Field of View Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Oser DG; Henson BR; Shiang EY; Finkelman MD; Amato RB
J Endod; 2017 Jun; 43(6):901-904. PubMed ID: 28359665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
