114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25366674)
1. Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting.
Nessa A; Roy JS; Chowdhury MA; Khanam Q; Afroz R; Wistrand C; Thuresson M; Thorsell M; Shemer I; Wikström Shemer EA
BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e005313. PubMed ID: 25366674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic colposcopic accuracy by the gynocular and a stationary colposcope.
Kallner HK; Persson M; Thuresson M; Altman D; Shemer I; Thorsell M; Shemer EA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 26063001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of stationary colposcope and the Gynocular, by the Swede score systematic colposcopic system in VIA positive women: a crossover randomized trial.
Nessa A; Wistrand C; Begum SA; Thuresson M; Shemer I; Thorsell M; Shemer EA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 24326529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of hand-held colposcope (Gynocular) in comparison with standard colposcope in patients with abnormal cervical cytology or visual inspection with acetic acid positivity: a cross over randomized controlled study.
Jayabalan S; Subbaiah M; Chaturvedula L
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2023 Jul; 66(4):300-306. PubMed ID: 37365989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement of colposcope and gynocular in assessment of cervical lesions by swede score: a randomized, crossover pilot trial.
Ngonzi J; Bajunirwe F; Wistrand C; Mayanja R; Altman D; Thorsell M; Wikström Shemer EA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 23645068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope.
Natarajan J; Mathur S; Vishnubhatla S; Kumar S; Vashist S; Ramanujam N; Singhal S; Meena J; Tanwar P; Bhatla N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Dec; 23(12):4013-4021. PubMed ID: 36579981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colposcopy telemedicine: live versus static swede score and accuracy in detecting CIN2+, a cross-sectional pilot study.
Taghavi K; Banerjee D; Mandal R; Kallner HK; Thorsell M; Friis T; Kocoska-Maras L; Strander B; Singer A; Wikström E
BMC Womens Health; 2018 Jun; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 29890991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Portable Pocket colposcopy performs comparably to standard-of-care clinical colposcopy using acetic acid and Lugol's iodine as contrast mediators: an investigational study in Peru.
Mueller JL; Lam CT; Dahl D; Asiedu MN; Krieger MS; Bellido-Fuentes Y; Kellish M; Peters J; Erkanli A; Ortiz EJ; Muasher LC; Taylor PT; Schmitt JW; Venegas G; Ramanujam N
BJOG; 2018 Sep; 125(10):1321-1329. PubMed ID: 29893472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a compact, rechargeable, magnifying device to triage VIA and HPV positive women in a cervical cancer screening program in rural India.
Basu P; Banerjee D; Mittal S; Mandal R; Ghosh I; Das P; Muwonge R; Biswas J
Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1253-9. PubMed ID: 27581249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of a low cost magnifying device, Magnivisualizer, versus colposcope for detection of pre-cancer and cancerous lesions of uterine cervix.
Singh V; Parashari A; Gupta S; Sodhani P; Sehgal A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 25142620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the AV Magnivisualizer device with colposcopy to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using the Swede scoring system.
Dayal U; Gupta B; Hariprasad R; Shriya R; Rajaram S; Prasad B; Mehrotra R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Nov; 147(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 31353466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colposcopic findings to study cervical changes in reproductive age group women using various contraceptives.
Bist R; Mohi MK; Garg R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jun; 309(6):2799-2809. PubMed ID: 38461428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design of a Novel Low Cost Point of Care Tampon (POCkeT) Colposcope for Use in Resource Limited Settings.
Lam CT; Krieger MS; Gallagher JE; Asma B; Muasher LC; Schmitt JW; Ramanujam N
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0135869. PubMed ID: 26332673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the feasibility of utilizing Gynocular-triage-to-diagnose application with VIA (Visual inspection with Acetic acid) in community cervical cancer screening programs in rural Mysore, India.
Srinivas V; Nishimura HM; Jayakrishna P; Krupp K; Madhivanan P; Madhunapantula SV
Indian J Cancer; 2021; 58(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 33402563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Screen and Treat" Approach among VIA Positive Women during Cervical Cancer Screening Program: Experience at Low Resource Setting.
Shahnaz S; Hira HM; Begum KN; Akhter R; Sharmin S
Mymensingh Med J; 2021 Oct; 30(4):1100-1106. PubMed ID: 34605483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A comparative study of digital colposcope and optical colposcope in the diagnosis of early lesions of uterine cervix].
Zhang W; Huang M; Li S; Wu L; Li N; Zhang X; Pan Q; Shen Y; Qiao Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 24(6):570-2. PubMed ID: 12667328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. International Image Concordance Study to Compare a Point-of-Care Tampon Colposcope With a Standard-of-Care Colposcope.
Mueller JL; Asma E; Lam CT; Krieger MS; Gallagher JE; Erkanli A; Hariprasad R; Malliga JS; Muasher LC; Mchome B; Oneko O; Taylor P; Venegas G; Wanyoro A; Mehrotra R; Schmitt JW; Ramanujam N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 28263237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Diagnostic Efficacy of Swede Score for Prediction of Pre-invasive Cervical Lesions: A Prospective Hospital-Based Study.
Rahman Z; Yadav G; Tripathi U
J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2020 Dec; 70(6):497-502. PubMed ID: 33417628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fluorescence colposcope with TMTP1-PEG4-ICG is comparable to the conventional colposcope in identifying cervical precancerous lesions: A randomized controlled trial.
Zhou Y; Wang C; Li W; Lu W; Liu X; Xi L; Li P; Lu J; Wei J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Sep; 162(3):969-976. PubMed ID: 36939553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colposcopic analysis of cervical lesions using popular scoring systems: Reid versus Swede.
Safoorah A; Kanagal D; D'Cunha P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Nov; 304(5):1253-1258. PubMed ID: 34432109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
