These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25366822)

  • 1. Suboptimal decision criteria are predicted by subjectively weighted probabilities and rewards.
    Ackermann JF; Landy MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):638-58. PubMed ID: 25366822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signals in human striatum are appropriate for policy update rather than value prediction.
    Li J; Daw ND
    J Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 31(14):5504-11. PubMed ID: 21471387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The irrationality of categorical perception.
    Fleming SM; Maloney LT; Daw ND
    J Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 33(49):19060-70. PubMed ID: 24305804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How overconfidence bias influences suboptimality in perceptual decision making.
    Hainguerlot M; Gajdos T; Vergnaud JC; de Gardelle V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Apr; 49(4):537-548. PubMed ID: 37184937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid Visuomotor Responses Reflect Value-Based Decisions.
    Carroll TJ; McNamee D; Ingram JN; Wolpert DM
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(20):3906-3920. PubMed ID: 30850511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dopaminergic Drug Effects on Probability Weighting during Risky Decision Making.
    Ojala KE; Janssen LK; Hashemi MM; Timmer MHM; Geurts DEM; Ter Huurne NP; Cools R; Sescousse G
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29632870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation.
    Balsdon T; Wyart V; Mamassian P
    Nat Commun; 2020 Apr; 11(1):1753. PubMed ID: 32273500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.
    Braun A; Urai AE; Donner TH
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2418-2429. PubMed ID: 29371318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the distortion of probability information in decision under risk and an equivalent visual task.
    Glaser C; Trommershäuser J; Mamassian P; Maloney LT
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Apr; 23(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 22395127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oculomotor freezing indicates conscious detection free of decision bias.
    White AL; Moreland JC; Rolfs M
    J Neurophysiol; 2022 Feb; 127(2):571-585. PubMed ID: 35080462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contribution of Sensory Encoding to Measured Bias.
    Jin M; Glickfeld LL
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 39(26):5115-5127. PubMed ID: 31015339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural response to reward anticipation under risk is nonlinear in probabilities.
    Hsu M; Krajbich I; Zhao C; Camerer CF
    J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(7):2231-7. PubMed ID: 19228976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moment-to-Moment Fluctuations in Neuronal Excitability Bias Subjective Perception Rather than Strategic Decision-Making.
    Iemi L; Busch NA
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 29911179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural substrates of reward magnitude, probability, and risk during a wheel of fortune decision-making task.
    Smith BW; Mitchell DG; Hardin MG; Jazbec S; Fridberg D; Blair RJ; Ernst M
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 18804540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual learning effect on decision and confidence thresholds.
    Solovey G; Shalom D; Pérez-Schuster V; Sigman M
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Oct; 45():24-36. PubMed ID: 27552254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual estimation under risk.
    Landy MS; Goutcher R; Trommershäuser J; Mamassian P
    J Vis; 2007 Apr; 7(6):4. PubMed ID: 17685787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty.
    Zhang H; Morvan C; Maloney LT
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Dec; 6(12):e1001023. PubMed ID: 21152007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expertise and gambling: using type 2 signal detection theory to investigate differences between regular gamblers and nongamblers.
    Lueddeke SE; Higham PA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1850-71. PubMed ID: 21846266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reward alters the perception of time.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Cognition; 2016 Mar; 148():19-26. PubMed ID: 26709497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive Bias in Ambiguity Judgements: Using Computational Models to Dissect the Effects of Mild Mood Manipulation in Humans.
    Iigaya K; Jolivald A; Jitkrittum W; Gilchrist ID; Dayan P; Paul E; Mendl M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165840. PubMed ID: 27829041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.