These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25366863)
1. Chloroplast DNA sequence utility for the lowest phylogenetic and phylogeographic inferences in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare IV. Shaw J; Shafer HL; Leonard OR; Kovach MJ; Schorr M; Morris AB Am J Bot; 2014 Nov; 101(11):1987-2004. PubMed ID: 25366863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. Shaw J; Lickey EB; Schilling EE; Small RL Am J Bot; 2007 Mar; 94(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 21636401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Highly variable chloroplast markers for evaluating plant phylogeny at low taxonomic levels and for DNA barcoding. Dong W; Liu J; Yu J; Wang L; Zhou S PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35071. PubMed ID: 22511980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amplification of noncoding chloroplast DNA for phylogenetic studies in lycophytes and monilophytes with a comparative example of relative phylogenetic utility from Ophioglossaceae. Small RL; Lickey EB; Shaw J; Hauk WD Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Sep; 36(3):509-22. PubMed ID: 15935702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Shaw J; Lickey EB; Beck JT; Farmer SB; Liu W; Miller J; Siripun KC; Winder CT; Schilling EE; Small RL Am J Bot; 2005 Jan; 92(1):142-66. PubMed ID: 21652394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of cpDNA markers for phylogenetic and phylogeographic analyses of closely related cactus species. Bonatelli IA; Zappi DC; Taylor NP; Moraes EM Genet Mol Res; 2013 Feb; 12(4):4579-85. PubMed ID: 23479172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraspecific sequence variation of chloroplast DNA among the component species of evergreen broad-leaved forests in Japan. Aoki K; Suzuki T; Murakami N J Plant Res; 2003 Aug; 116(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 12820018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rampant polyphyly in the Arracacia clade (Apiaceae) and an assessment of the phylogenetic utility of 20 noncoding plastid loci. Danderson CA; Downie SR; Hermann M Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2018 Jan; 118():286-305. PubMed ID: 29017853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nuclear and cpDNA sequences combined provide strong inference of higher phylogenetic relationships in the phlox family (Polemoniaceae). Johnson LA; Chan LM; Weese TL; Busby LD; McMurry S Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Sep; 48(3):997-1012. PubMed ID: 18621551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chloroplast genome (cpDNA) of Cycas taitungensis and 56 cp protein-coding genes of Gnetum parvifolium: insights into cpDNA evolution and phylogeny of extant seed plants. Wu CS; Wang YN; Liu SM; Chaw SM Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jun; 24(6):1366-79. PubMed ID: 17383970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Molecular evolution of the trnTUGU-trnFGAA region in Bryophytes. Quandt D; Stech M Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2004 Sep; 6(5):545-54. PubMed ID: 15375725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence of chloroplast capture in South American Nothofagus (subgenus Nothofagus, Nothofagaceae). Acosta MC; Premoli AC Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Jan; 54(1):235-42. PubMed ID: 19683588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patterns and relative rates of nucleotide and insertion/deletion evolution at six chloroplast intergenic regions in new world species of the Lecythidaceae. Hamilton MB; Braverman JM; Soria-Hernanz DF Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Oct; 20(10):1710-21. PubMed ID: 12832633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative genomics of four Liliales families inferred from the complete chloroplast genome sequence of Veratrum patulum O. Loes. (Melanthiaceae). Do HD; Kim JS; Kim JH Gene; 2013 Nov; 530(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 23973725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The tortoise and the hare: choosing between noncoding plastome and nuclear Adh sequences for phylogeny reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group. Small RL; Ryburn JA; Cronn RC; Seelanan T; Wendel JF Am J Bot; 1998 Sep; 85(9):1301-15. PubMed ID: 21685016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic profiling of plastid DNA variation in the Mediterranean olive tree. Besnard G; Hernández P; Khadari B; Dorado G; Savolainen V BMC Plant Biol; 2011 May; 11():80. PubMed ID: 21569271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of chloroplast DNA to resolve plant phylogenies: noncoding versus rbcL sequences. Gielly L; Taberlet P Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Sep; 11(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 7968490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of chloroplast DNA barcoding markers to individualize Papaver somniferum for forensic intelligence purposes. Graham K; Houston R Int J Legal Med; 2024 Jan; 138(1):267-275. PubMed ID: 35788906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction of a nuclear marker for phylogenetic analysis of Nepenthaceae. Meimberg H; Heubl G Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2006 Nov; 8(6):831-40. PubMed ID: 17203435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of context-dependent mutations in generating compositional and codon usage bias in grass chloroplast DNA. Morton BR J Mol Evol; 2003 May; 56(5):616-29. PubMed ID: 12698298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]