408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25366871)
1. Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review.
Javed F; Romanos GE
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25366871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of Implant Shape (Tapered vs Cylindrical) on the Survival of Dental Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review.
Alshehri M; Alshehri F
Implant Dent; 2016 Dec; 25(6):855-860. PubMed ID: 27749519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
Wallace SS; Froum SJ
Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival of Implants Using the Osteotome Technique With or Without Grafting in the Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review.
Shi JY; Gu YX; Zhuang LF; Lai HC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1077-88. PubMed ID: 27632263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival Rates of Short Dental Implants (≤ 6.5 mm) Placed in Posterior Edentulous Ridges and Factors Affecting their Survival after a 12-Month Follow-up Period: A Systematic Review.
Al-Johany SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):605–621. PubMed ID: 30703180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Platform switching minimises crestal bone loss around dental implants: truth or myth?
Romanos GE; Javed F
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 41(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 24860981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term outcomes for the treatment of atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review of literature.
Corbella S; Taschieri S; Del Fabbro M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23656352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial.
Becker W; Sennerby L; Bedrossian E; Becker BE; Lucchini JP
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 15857073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Terminal Posterior Tilted Implants Planned as a Sinus Graft Alternative for Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Maxillary Restoration: A Case Series with 10- to 19-Year Results on 44 Consecutive Patients Presenting for Routine Maintenance.
Fortin Y; Sullivan RM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 27329930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Systematic Review of the Role of Implant Design in the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla.
Jokstad A; Sanz M; Ogawa T; Bassi F; Levin L; Wennerberg A; Romanos GE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31 Suppl():s43-99. PubMed ID: 27228254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Partial Rehabilitation with Distally Tilted and Straight Implants in the Posterior Maxilla with Immediate Loading Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 5-Year Follow-up.
Queridinha BM; Almeida RF; Felino A; de Araújo Nobre M; Maló P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):891-9. PubMed ID: 27447158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Partial rehabilitation of the posterior edentulous maxilla using axial and tilted implants in immediate function to avoid bone grafting.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011; 32(9):E136-45. PubMed ID: 23627307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of 6.5-mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison.
Yu H; Wang X; Qiu L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):111-122. PubMed ID: 27436543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective study of pterygoid implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: implant and prosthesis survival rates up to 3 years.
Curi MM; Cardoso CL; Ribeiro Kde C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 25830398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schiegnitz E; Al-Nawas B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():21-40. PubMed ID: 30328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of implant-failure predictors in the posterior maxilla: a retrospective study of 1395 implants.
Pabst AM; Walter C; Ehbauer S; Zwiener I; Ziebart T; Al-Nawas B; Klein MO
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 25697051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survival rate for implants placed in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation: a comparative cohort study.
Barone A; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U
J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 20831372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla including immediate fixed provisional restoration without the use of bone grafting: a review of 1-year outcome data from a long-term prospective clinical trial.
Toljanic JA; Baer RA; Ekstrand K; Thor A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 19587876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival of dental implants in native and grafted bone in irradiated head and neck cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.
Buddula A; Assad DA; Salinas TJ; Garces YI
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):644-8. PubMed ID: 22406706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
