BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25366997)

  • 1. A laboratory study of the performance of the handheld diffusion size classifier (DiSCmini) for various aerosols in the 15-400 nm range.
    Bau S; Zimmermann B; Payet R; Witschger O
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Feb; 17(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 25366997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-comparison of personal monitors for nanoparticles exposure at workplaces and in the environment.
    Todea AM; Beckmann S; Kaminski H; Bard D; Bau S; Clavaguera S; Dahmann D; Dozol H; Dziurowitz N; Elihn K; Fierz M; Lidén G; Meyer-Plath A; Monz C; Neumann V; Pelzer J; Simonow BK; Thali P; Tuinman I; van der Vleuten A; Vroomen H; Asbach C
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 605-606():929-945. PubMed ID: 28688352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies.
    Brouwer DH; Gijsbers JH; Lurvink MW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jul; 48(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 15240340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparability of portable nanoparticle exposure monitors.
    Asbach C; Kaminski H; von Barany D; Kuhlbusch TA; Monz C; Dziurowitz N; Pelzer J; Vossen K; Berlin K; Dietrich S; Götz U; Kiesling HJ; Schierl R; Dahmann D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):606-21. PubMed ID: 22752099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An occupational exposure assessment for engineered nanoparticles used in semiconductor fabrication.
    Shepard MN; Brenner S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):251-65. PubMed ID: 24284882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the diffusion size classifier (meDiSC) for the real-time measurement of particle size and number concentration of nanoaerosols in the range 20-700 nm.
    Bau S; Jacoby J; Witschger O
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Mar; 14(3):1014-23. PubMed ID: 22334128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining NSAM and CPC concentrations to determine airborne nanoparticle count median diameter: Application to various laboratory and workplace aerosols.
    Bau S; Payet R; Toussaint A; Witschger O; Todea AM; Monz C; Asbach C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Jun; 15(6):492-501. PubMed ID: 29580178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance Comparison of Field Portable Instruments to the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Using Monodispersed and Polydispersed Sodium Chloride Aerosols.
    Vo E; Horvatin M; Zhuang Z
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Jul; 62(6):711-720. PubMed ID: 29788040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metrological assessment of a portable analyzer for monitoring the particle size distribution of ultrafine particles.
    Stabile L; Cauda E; Marini S; Buonanno G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Aug; 58(7):860-76. PubMed ID: 24817159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial and temporal variability of incidental nanoparticles in indoor workplaces: impact on the characterization of point source exposures.
    Niu J; Rasmussen PE; Magee R; Nilsson G
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Jan; 17(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 25410705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of filter media for particle number, surface area and mass penetrations.
    Li L; Zuo Z; Japuntich DA; Pui DY
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):581-94. PubMed ID: 22752097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contamination and release of nanomaterials associated with the use of personal protective clothing.
    Tsai CS
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):491-503. PubMed ID: 25582117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing exposures to airborne metals and nanoparticle emissions in a refinery.
    Miller A; Drake PL; Hintz P; Habjan M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Jul; 54(5):504-13. PubMed ID: 20403942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance evaluation of newly developed portable aerosol sizers used for nanomaterial aerosol measurements.
    Yamada M; Takaya M; Ogura I
    Ind Health; 2015; 53(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 26320727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal evolution of nanoparticle aerosols in workplace exposure.
    Seipenbusch M; Binder A; Kasper G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Nov; 52(8):707-16. PubMed ID: 18927101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of Airborne Nanoparticle Loss in Sampling Tubing.
    Tsai CS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(8):D161-7. PubMed ID: 25746064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Workplace aerosol mass concentration measurement using optical particle counters.
    Görner P; Simon X; Bémer D; Lidén G
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Feb; 14(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 22009365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.