200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25367072)
1. Accuracy and Reproducibility of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Immunohistochemistry: A Quality Control Study in Tuscany Evaluating the Impact of Updated 2013 ASCO/CAP Recommendations.
Bianchi S; Caini S; Paglierani M; Saieva C; Vezzosi V; Baroni G; Simoni A; Palli D;
Pathol Oncol Res; 2015 Apr; 21(2):477-85. PubMed ID: 25367072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers.
Tchrakian N; Flanagan L; Harford J; Gannon JM; Quinn CM
Virchows Arch; 2016 Feb; 468(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 26521061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laboratory compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing guidelines: a 3-year comparison of validation procedures.
Dyhdalo KS; Fitzgibbons PL; Goldsmith JD; Souers RJ; Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 138(7):876-84. PubMed ID: 24978913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.
Press MF; Seoane JA; Curtis C; Quinaux E; Guzman R; Sauter G; Eiermann W; Mackey JR; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Slamon DJ
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Mar; 5(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 30520947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HER2 Testing for Breast Cancer in the Genomics Laboratory: A Sea Change for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.
Geiersbach KB; Sill DR; Meyer RG; Yuhas JA; Sukov WR; Mounajjed T; Carter JM; Jenkins RB; Chen B
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):883-886. PubMed ID: 33112955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 reporting guidelines in breast cancer: An assessment study from Indian oncology centre that primarily performs HER2 IHC testing with special emphasis on IHC equivocal category.
Pasricha S; Gupta G; Garg R; Sharma A; Gandhi JS; Durga G; Kamboj M; Grover S; Mehta A
Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 29251392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
Varga Z; Noske A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups.
Woo JW; Lee K; Chung YR; Jang MH; Ahn S; Park SY
Hum Pathol; 2020 Apr; 98():10-21. PubMed ID: 32027910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+ cases?
Curado M; Caramelo AS; Eloy C; Polónia A
Virchows Arch; 2019 Sep; 475(3):303-311. PubMed ID: 30953146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases.
Middleton LP; Price KM; Puig P; Heydon LJ; Tarco E; Sneige N; Barr K; Deavers MT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 May; 133(5):775-80. PubMed ID: 19415952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Impact of Partial Weak Staining in Normal Breast Epithelium on the Reliability of Immunohistochemistry Results in HercepTest-positive Breast Cancer.
Farra C; Fedda F; Tfayli A; Tawil A; Zaatari G; Ashkar H; Issa G; Boulos F
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(5):340-344. PubMed ID: 31213407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver Variation in the Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Expression Levels in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Can We Improve the Identification of Low Levels of HER2 Expression by Adjusting the Criteria? An International Interobserver Study.
Baez-Navarro X; van Bockstal MR; Nawawi D; Broeckx G; Colpaert C; Doebar SC; Hogenes MCH; Koop E; Lambein K; Peeters DJE; Sinke RHJA; Bastiaan van Brakel J; van der Starre-Gaal J; van der Vegt B; van de Vijver K; Vreuls CPH; Vreuls W; Westenend PJ; van Deurzen CHM
Mod Pathol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):100009. PubMed ID: 36788064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry in breast core needle biopsies.
Lebeau A; Turzynski A; Braun S; Behrhof W; Fleige B; Schmitt WD; Grob TJ; Burkhardt L; Hölzel D; Jackisch C; Thomssen C; Müller V; Untch M
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Jul; 28(20):3264-70. PubMed ID: 20498397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High concordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for HER2 status in breast cancer requires a normalized IHC scoring system.
Gown AM; Goldstein LC; Barry TS; Kussick SJ; Kandalaft PL; Kim PM; Tse CC
Mod Pathol; 2008 Oct; 21(10):1271-7. PubMed ID: 18487992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.
Guo L; Yuan P; Zhang J; Ling Y; Li W; Zhao B; Ying J; Xuan L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 28712009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Change in Pattern of HER2 Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Results in Breast Cancers Submitted for FISH Testing: Experience of a Reference Laboratory Using US Food and Drug Administration Criteria and American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Guidelines.
Shah MV; Wiktor AE; Meyer RG; Tenner KS; Ballman KV; Green SJ; Sukov WR; Ketterling RP; Perez EA; Jenkins RB
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(29):3502-3510. PubMed ID: 27458302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
