355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25367107)
21. Are ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty associated with reduced revision risk for late dislocation?
Pitto RP; Garland M; Sedel L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3790-5. PubMed ID: 26070775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Revision of Metal-on-metal Hip Prostheses Results in Marked Reduction of Blood Cobalt and Chromium Ion Concentrations.
Lainiala O; Reito A; Elo P; Pajamäki J; Puolakka T; Eskelinen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jul; 473(7):2305-13. PubMed ID: 25623595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty for failed large head metal-on-metal bearings.
Meriem S; Antoniadis A; Palazzuolo M; Wegrzyn J
Int Orthop; 2024 Mar; 48(3):719-727. PubMed ID: 37907694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Is Associated With Lower Survivorship and More Complications.
Morison Z; Moojen DJ; Nauth A; Hall J; McKee MD; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 26335343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
Varnum C
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes of Revision Surgery for "Pseudotumors" in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Liow MH; Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Kwon YM
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2835-2842. PubMed ID: 27387480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adverse Tissue Reactions and Metal Ion Behavior After Small-Head Metasul Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.
Ishida T; Tateiwa T; Takahashi Y; Nishikawa Y; Shishido T; Masaoka T; Yamamoto K
Orthop Surg; 2022 Feb; 14(2):264-273. PubMed ID: 34910382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adverse reactions to metal debris occur with all types of hip replacement not just metal-on-metal hips: a retrospective observational study of 3340 revisions for adverse reactions to metal debris from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
Matharu GS; Pandit HG; Murray DW; Judge A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Dec; 17(1):495. PubMed ID: 27955657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Rahman WA; Amenábar T; Hetaimish BM; Safir OA; Kuzyk PR; Gross AE
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2559-2563. PubMed ID: 27378637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA?
Bayley N; Khan H; Grosso P; Hupel T; Stevens D; Snider M; Schemitsch E; Kuzyk P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):477-84. PubMed ID: 25085361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cumulative revision rate is higher in metal-on-metal THA than metal-on-polyethylene THA: analysis of survival in a community registry.
Huang DC; Tatman P; Mehle S; Gioe TJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 471(6):1920-5. PubMed ID: 23392990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.
Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3867-75. PubMed ID: 25894808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. What Can We Learn From 20-year Followup Studies of Hip Replacement?
Martin CT; Callaghan JJ; Gao Y; Pugely AJ; Liu SS; Warth LC; Goetz DD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):402-7. PubMed ID: 25800375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Porous metal acetabular components have a low rate of mechanical failure in THA after operatively treated acetabular fracture.
Yuan BJ; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 25106802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Incidence of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris From 28-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties With Minimum 10 Years of Follow-Up: Clinical, Laboratory, and Ultrasound Assessment of 44 Cases.
Ayoub B; Putman S; Cholewinski P; Paris A; Migaud H; Girard J
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1206-1210. PubMed ID: 27988181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve.
Lim SJ; Jang SP; Kim DW; Moon YW; Park YS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3781-7. PubMed ID: 26024582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
