These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25367141)

  • 1. Holistic processing does not require configural variability.
    Richler JJ; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):974-9. PubMed ID: 25367141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual integrality of componential and configural information in faces.
    Amishav R; Kimchi R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):743-8. PubMed ID: 21037176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behind the face of holistic perception: Holistic processing of Gestalt stimuli and faces recruit overlapping perceptual mechanisms.
    Curby KM; Moerel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2873-2880. PubMed ID: 31165455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Framing faces: Frame alignment impacts holistic face perception.
    Curby KM; Entenman R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 27590479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disrupting perceptual grouping of face parts impairs holistic face processing.
    Curby KM; Goldstein RR; Blacker K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 23179914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual integration and the composite face effect.
    Liu CH; Young AW; Basra G; Ren N; Chen W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jul; 73(7):1101-1114. PubMed ID: 31910718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Featural and configural face processing differentially modulate ERP components.
    Mercure E; Dick F; Johnson MH
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():162-70. PubMed ID: 18722354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Composite faces are not processed holistically: evidence from the Garner and redundant target paradigms.
    Fitousi D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):2037-60. PubMed ID: 25925281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decomposing the composite face effect: Evidence for non-holistic processing based on the ex-Gaussian distribution.
    Fitousi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):819-840. PubMed ID: 31952449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Holistic processing of face configurations and components.
    Hayward WG; Crookes K; Chu MH; Favelle SK; Rhodes G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1482-9. PubMed ID: 27379870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the role of selective and divided attention in the composite face effect: Insights from Attention Operating Characteristic (AOC) plots and cross-contingency correlations.
    Fitousi D
    Cognition; 2016 Mar; 148():34-46. PubMed ID: 26722710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic composite faces are processed holistically.
    Favelle S; Tobin A; Piepers D; Burke D; Robbins RA
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():26-32. PubMed ID: 25982714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The perception of a face can be greater than the sum of its parts.
    Shen J; Palmeri TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):710-6. PubMed ID: 25228169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tuning Attention to Object Categories: Spatially Global Effects of Attention to Faces in Visual Processing.
    Störmer VS; Cohen MA; Alvarez GA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 31(7):937-947. PubMed ID: 30912729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.
    Boutet I; Lemieux CL; Goulet MA; Collin CA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1050-1063. PubMed ID: 28185225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Looking at the upper facial half enlarges the range of holistic face processing.
    Wang Z; Ni H; Zhou X; Yang X; Zheng Z; Sun YP; Zhang X; Jin H
    Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):2419. PubMed ID: 36765162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaction between social categories in the composite face paradigm.
    Chen W; Ren N; Young AW; Liu CH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):34-49. PubMed ID: 28557505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Holistic face perception is modulated by experience-dependent perceptual grouping.
    Curby KM; Entenman RJ; Fleming JT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1392-404. PubMed ID: 27029482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.