These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25367527)

  • 1. Economic weights for maternal traits of sows, including sow longevity.
    Amer PR; Ludemann CI; Hermesch S
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Dec; 92(12):5345-57. PubMed ID: 25367527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic weights for performance and survival traits of growing pigs.
    Hermesch S; Ludemann CI; Amer PR
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Dec; 92(12):5358-66. PubMed ID: 25367529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of incorporating environmental cost and risk aversion on economic values of pig breeding goal traits.
    Ali BM; de Mey Y; Bastiaansen JWM; Oude Lansink AGJM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Jun; 135(3):194-207. PubMed ID: 29878493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breeding objectives for pigs in Kenya. II: economic values incorporating risks in different smallholder production systems.
    Mbuthia JM; Rewe TO; Kahi AK
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2015 Feb; 47(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 25433647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection for sow longevity.
    Serenius T; Stalder KJ
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Apr; 84 Suppl():E166-71. PubMed ID: 16582089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
    Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Billon Y; Lagant H; Guillouet P; Sellier P; Noblet J; Hermesch S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1097-108. PubMed ID: 22100596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic relationships between boar feed efficiency and sow piglet production, body condition score, and stayability in Norwegian Landrace pigs.
    Martinsen KH; Ødegård J; Aasmundstad T; Olsen D; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3159-3168. PubMed ID: 27695777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review: Improving pig survival with a focus on birthweight: a practical breeding perspective.
    Harper J; Bunter KL
    Animal; 2024 Jun; 18 Suppl 1():100914. PubMed ID: 37574357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breeding for societally important traits in pigs.
    Kanis E; De Greef KH; Hiemstra A; van Arendonk JA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Apr; 83(4):948-57. PubMed ID: 15753352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic parameters for within-litter variation in piglet birth weight and change in within-litter variation during suckling.
    Damgaard LH; Rydhmer L; Løvendahl P; Grandinson K
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Mar; 81(3):604-10. PubMed ID: 12661639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity.
    Serenius T; Stalder KJ; Baas TJ; Mabry JW; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Robison OW; Tokach M; Miller RK
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2590-5. PubMed ID: 16908665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bioeconomic evaluation of sow longevity and profitability.
    Rodriguez-Zas SL; Southey BR; Knox RV; Connor JF; Lowe JF; Roskamp BJ
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Dec; 81(12):2915-22. PubMed ID: 14677846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic variation in piglet mortality in outdoor organic production systems.
    Chu TT; Zaalberg RM; Bovbjerg H; Jensen J; Villumsen TM
    Animal; 2022 May; 16(5):100529. PubMed ID: 35483172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic aspects regarding piglet losses and the maternal behaviour of sows. Part 1. Genetic analysis of piglet mortality and fertility traits in pigs.
    Hellbrügge B; Tölle KH; Bennewitz J; Henze C; Presuhn U; Krieter J
    Animal; 2008 Sep; 2(9):1273-80. PubMed ID: 22443815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic weights of maternal and direct traits of pigs calculated by applying gene flow methods.
    Wolfová M; Krupa E; Krupová Z; Žáková E
    Animal; 2019 Jun; 13(6):1127-1136. PubMed ID: 30348237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of economic weights for number of teats and sperm quality traits in pigs.
    Krupa E; Wolfová M; Krupová Z; Žáková E
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Mar; 137(2):189-199. PubMed ID: 31515873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can a super sow be a robust sow? Consequences of litter investment in purebred and crossbred sows of different parities.
    Ocepek M; Andersen-Ranberg I; Edwards SA; Fredriksen B; Framstad T; Andersen IL
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3550-3560. PubMed ID: 27695774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phenotypic and genetic variation in longevity of Polish Landrace sows.
    Sobczyńska M; Blicharski T
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Aug; 132(4):318-27. PubMed ID: 25882772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Traits Defining Sow Lifetime Maternal Performance.
    Vargovic L; Harper JA; Bunter KL
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Sep; 12(18):. PubMed ID: 36139312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2303-15. PubMed ID: 12350007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.