These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25367529)

  • 21. Genetic parameters between slaughter pig efficiency and growth rate of different body tissues estimated by computed tomography in live boars of Landrace and Duroc.
    Gjerlaug-Enger E; Kongsro J; Odegård J; Aass L; Vangen O
    Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22436149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetic variance and covariance and breed differences for feed intake and average daily gain to improve feed efficiency in growing cattle.
    Retallick KJ; Bormann JM; Weaber RL; MacNeil MD; Bradford HL; Freetly HC; Hales KE; Moser DW; Snelling WM; Thallman RM; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1444-1450. PubMed ID: 28464090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationships with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle.
    Nkrumah JD; Basarab JA; Price MA; Okine EK; Ammoura A; Guercio S; Hansen C; Li C; Benkel B; Murdoch B; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2451-9. PubMed ID: 15318746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genotype by environment interactions for performance and thermoregulation responses in growing pigs1,2.
    Gourdine JL; Riquet J; Rosé R; Poullet N; Giorgi M; Billon Y; Renaudeau D; Gilbert H
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3699-3713. PubMed ID: 31351442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Characterization of feed efficiency traits and relationships with feeding behavior and ultrasound carcass traits in growing bulls.
    Lancaster PA; Carstens GE; Ribeiro FR; Tedeschi LO; Crews DH
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(4):1528-39. PubMed ID: 18997083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls.
    Crowley JJ; McGee M; Kenny DA; Crews DH; Evans RD; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):885-94. PubMed ID: 19966161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contribution of semen trait selection, artificial insemination technique, and semen dose to the profitability of pig production systems: A simulation study.
    Gonzalez-Pena D; Knox RV; Rodriguez-Zas SL
    Theriogenology; 2016 Jan; 85(2):335-44. PubMed ID: 26435262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Economic weights of maternal and direct traits of pigs calculated by applying gene flow methods.
    Wolfová M; Krupa E; Krupová Z; Žáková E
    Animal; 2019 Jun; 13(6):1127-1136. PubMed ID: 30348237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breeding objectives for pigs in Kenya. II: economic values incorporating risks in different smallholder production systems.
    Mbuthia JM; Rewe TO; Kahi AK
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2015 Feb; 47(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 25433647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficiency of different selection strategies against boar taint in pigs.
    Haberland AM; Luther H; Hofer A; Tholen E; Simianer H; Lind B; Baes C
    Animal; 2014 Jan; 8(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 24176119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New breeding objectives and selection indices for the Australian dairy industry.
    Byrne TJ; Santos BFS; Amer PR; Martin-Collado D; Pryce JE; Axford M
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Oct; 99(10):8146-8167. PubMed ID: 27522425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Production performance, carcass composition, and adipose tissue traits of heavy pigs: influence of breed and production system.
    Lebret B; Dourmad JY; Mourot J; Pollet PY; Gondret F
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3543-56. PubMed ID: 25074454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A genomewide association study of feed efficiency and feeding behaviors at two fattening stages in a White Duroc × Erhualian F population.
    Guo YM; Zhang ZY; Ma JW; Ai HS; Ren J; Huang LS
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1481-9. PubMed ID: 26020169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of breed composition on phenotypic residual feed intake and growth in Angus, Brahman, and Angus x Brahman crossbred cattle.
    Elzo MA; Riley DG; Hansen GR; Johnson DD; Myer RO; Coleman SW; Chase CC; Wasdin JG; Driver JD
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Dec; 87(12):3877-86. PubMed ID: 19684277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetic parameters for two selection criteria for feed efficiency in rabbits.
    Drouilhet L; Gilbert H; Balmisse E; Ruesche J; Tircazes A; Larzul C; Garreau H
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3121-8. PubMed ID: 23658340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers.
    Kelly AK; McGee M; Crews DH; Fahey AG; Wylie AR; Kenny DA
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):109-23. PubMed ID: 19820067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
    Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Billon Y; Lagant H; Guillouet P; Sellier P; Noblet J; Hermesch S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1097-108. PubMed ID: 22100596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The value of using DNA markers for beef bull selection in the seedstock sector.
    Van Eenennaam AL; van der Werf JH; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):307-20. PubMed ID: 21262975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle.
    Nkrumah JD; Basarab JA; Wang Z; Li C; Price MA; Okine EK; Crews DH; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2711-20. PubMed ID: 17526662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian analysis of the effect of selection for residual feed intake on growth and feed intake curves in Yorkshire swine.
    Cai W; Kaiser MS; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Jan; 90(1):127-41. PubMed ID: 21873534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.