These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25368459)

  • 41. Copper T380 intrauterine device for emergency contraception: highly effective at any time in the menstrual cycle.
    Turok DK; Godfrey EM; Wojdyla D; Dermish A; Torres L; Wu SC
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2672-6. PubMed ID: 23945595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Expulsion of Nova-T380, Multiload 375, and Copper-T380A contraceptive devices inserted during cesarean delivery.
    Ragab A; Hamed HO; Alsammani MA; Shalaby H; Nabeil H; Barakat R; Fetih AN
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 130(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 25975871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Acceptability and clinical performance of a copper-containing frameless IUCD in Hong Kong.
    Wong CY; Ng WL; Lo ST; Fan YS
    Contraception; 2005 Jan; 71(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 15639073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Real-time ultrasound in locating intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Nelson LH; Miller JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Dec; 54(6):711-4. PubMed ID: 514557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Long-term cytologic studies of copper-IUD users.
    Engineer AD; Misra JS; Tandon P
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 6945020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Malpositioned IUCD: the menace of postpartum IUCD insertion.
    Nigam A; Ahmad A; Gupta N; Kumari A
    BMJ Case Rep; 2015 Aug; 2015():. PubMed ID: 26290564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Nalini N; Singh B; Jha S; Singh AV
    J Family Med Prim Care; 2023 May; 12(5):868-873. PubMed ID: 37448945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Open surgical retrieval of intra-uterine contraceptive device perforating the ileum: A case report.
    Almatary A; Alsharif A; Ghabisha S; Ahmed F; Badheeb M
    Int J Surg Case Rep; 2023 Aug; 109():108635. PubMed ID: 37552923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertions in Caesarean and Vaginal Deliveries: A Comparative Study of Follow-Up Outcomes.
    Hooda R; Mann S; Nanda S; Gupta A; More H; Bhutani J
    Int J Reprod Med; 2016; 2016():7695847. PubMed ID: 27631023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Cross Sectional Study on Acceptability and Safety of IUCD among Postpartum Mothers at Tertiary Care Hospital, Telangana.
    Jairaj S; Dayyala S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Jan; 10(1):LC01-4. PubMed ID: 26894092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Use of ultrasound in predicting success of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion immediately after delivery.
    Dias T; Abeykoon S; Kumarasiri S; Gunawardena C; Padeniya T; D'Antonio F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 46(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 25418016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Postpartum and postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Martorella LA; Esposito JM
    J Reprod Med; 1975 Apr; 14(4):178-81. PubMed ID: 1142352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparative performance of two copper-wired IUDs (ML Cu 250 and T Cu 200: immediate postpartum and interval insertion.
    Van Der Pas MT; Delbeke L; Van Dets H
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1980 Jan; 1(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 12261715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The IUD: dispelling the myths and assessing the potential.
    Mishell Dr ; Sulak PJ
    Dialogues Contracept; 1997; 5(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 12292543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Postpartum insertion of the combined multiload copper intra-uterine device (M L Cu 250).
    Wathen NC; Sapire KE; Davey DA
    S Afr Med J; 1978 Sep; 54(12):473-6. PubMed ID: 734576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Intrauterine contraception with copper-T 200 device- a retrospective analysis of 334 cases (author's transl)].
    Salzer H; Schneider WH; Eppel W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1981 May; 93(11):354-8. PubMed ID: 7269615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of the actual and expected pain response following insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Goldstuck ND; Matthews ML
    Clin Reprod Fertil; 1985 Mar; 3(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 3978537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of levonorgestrel and copper releasing intrauterine contraceptive device on body iron stores and menstrual bleeding patterns: experience on Indian women.
    Rana M; Saxena P; Firdous N
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2012 Feb; 16(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 22428475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Changing Scenario in Indian Contraceptive Methods: A Glimpse Through a Tertiary Hospital Statistics.
    Dewan R; Bajaj B; Kapoor G; Pardeshi GS
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2019 Oct; 69(5):462-466. PubMed ID: 31598051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Steroid intra-uterine contraception: progesterone-releasing devices. II. Insertion, clinical problems and contraceptive dependability].
    Custo GM; Cosmi EV
    Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1984; 12(4):331-43. PubMed ID: 12340352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.