These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25368501)
21. Medical research and the news media. Campion EW N Engl J Med; 2004 Dec; 351(23):2436-7. PubMed ID: 15575061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The mBio American Academy of Microbiology Submission Track in 2017. Casadevall A; Shenk T mBio; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 28174305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. On editorial practice and peer review. Shahar E J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17683318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. How Publish or Perish Promotes Inaccuracy in Science -- and Journalism. Oransky I AMA J Ethics; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1172-5. PubMed ID: 26698592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Freedom of expression and editorial independence: Four firings and a Kafkanian process]. Gøtzsche PC Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Apr; 170(18):1537-8. PubMed ID: 18454921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. There are no schools for medical editors. Seggie J S Afr Med J; 2013 Jan; 103(2):65-6. PubMed ID: 23374308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. How honest can a medical journal be? Groves T Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Feb; 46(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 16441685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Conflict of interest and disclosure policies in psychiatry and medicine: a comparative study of peer-reviewed journals. Khurana G; Henderson S; Walter G; Martin A Acad Psychiatry; 2012 Jan; 36(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22362431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned. Adam D; Knight J Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Medical Mycology. Editorial. Salkin IF Med Mycol; 2012 Jan; 50(1):1. PubMed ID: 22172003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective. Sohail S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Travelling but never arriving: reflections of a retiring editor. Twenty five years of adventure, discovery, and conservatism]. Smith R Rev Neurol; 2005 Jan 16-31; 40(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 15712156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer review at the Health Information and Libraries Journal. Grant MJ Health Info Libr J; 2014 Dec; 31(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 25443027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Conceptual debates and empirical evidence about the peer review process for scholarly journals. Thomas SP J Prof Nurs; 2011; 27(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 21596357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Five direct questions to Josef Milerad concerning credibility]. Holmgren PG Lakartidningen; 2003 Jan; 100(5):346, 349. PubMed ID: 12607383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Standards for ethical publication. Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A gradual peer-review process. Lev-Yadun S Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5901):528. PubMed ID: 18948519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Release of research results to the public]. Rosenberg J Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Nov; 171(47):3419. PubMed ID: 19925724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A labour of love: 'no schools for medical editors'. Pillay T S Afr Med J; 2013 Apr; 103(4):213. PubMed ID: 23687659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]