These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25368547)

  • 1. Improving spatial localization in MEG inverse imaging by leveraging intersubject anatomical differences.
    Larson E; Maddox RK; Lee AK
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():330. PubMed ID: 25368547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
    Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-subject MEG/EEG source imaging with sparse multi-task regression.
    Janati H; Bazeille T; Thirion B; Cuturi M; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 220():116847. PubMed ID: 32438046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.
    Molins A; Stufflebeam SM; Brown EN; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1069-77. PubMed ID: 18602485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
    Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards an objective evaluation of EEG/MEG source estimation methods - The linear approach.
    Hauk O; Stenroos M; Treder MS
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 255():119177. PubMed ID: 35390459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatiotemporal imaging of human brain activity using functional MRI constrained magnetoencephalography data: Monte Carlo simulations.
    Liu AK; Belliveau JW; Dale AM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Jul; 95(15):8945-50. PubMed ID: 9671784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential Use of MEG to Understand Abnormalities in Auditory Function in Clinical Populations.
    Larson E; Lee AK
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():151. PubMed ID: 24659963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interictal and ictal source localization for epilepsy surgery using high-density EEG with MEG: a prospective long-term study.
    Plummer C; Vogrin SJ; Woods WP; Murphy MA; Cook MJ; Liley DTJ
    Brain; 2019 Apr; 142(4):932-951. PubMed ID: 30805596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
    Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
    Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Requirements for Coregistration Accuracy in On-Scalp MEG.
    Zetter R; Iivanainen J; Stenroos M; Parkkonen L
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Nov; 31(6):931-948. PubMed ID: 29934728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with l(p)-norm priors.
    Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 15955497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Space-Time-Frequency Multi-Sensor Analysis for Motor Cortex Localization Using Magnetoencephalography.
    Auboiroux V; Larzabal C; Langar L; Rohu V; Mishchenko A; Arizumi N; Labyt E; Benabid AL; Aksenova T
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 32397472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.