BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25368594)

  • 1. Processing different kinds of semantic relations in picture-word interference with non-masked and masked distractors.
    Damian MF; Spalek K
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1183. PubMed ID: 25368594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):614-27. PubMed ID: 22200912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancement and suppression in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm.
    Abel S; Dressel K; Weiller C; Huber W
    Brain Behav; 2012 Mar; 2(2):109-27. PubMed ID: 22574280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feature overlap slows lexical selection: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Vieth HE; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2325-39. PubMed ID: 24830335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access.
    Vieth HE; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1014. PubMed ID: 25278914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming.
    Diaz MT; Hogstrom LJ; Zhuang J; Voyvodic JT; Johnson MA; Camblin CC
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():167. PubMed ID: 24715859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Now you see it, now you don't: on turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task.
    Finkbeiner M; Caramazza A
    Cortex; 2006 Aug; 42(6):790-6. PubMed ID: 17131581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of hearing loss on semantic access by auditory and audiovisual speech in children.
    Jerger S; Tye-Murray N; Damian MF; Abdi H
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):753-62. PubMed ID: 23782714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.
    Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1443-53. PubMed ID: 19857015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the flow of information during speaking: the impact of morpho-phonological, associative, and categorical picture distractors on picture naming.
    Bölte J; Böhl A; Dobel C; Zwitserlood P
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1540. PubMed ID: 26528209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Costa A; Alario FX; Caramazza A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 15948287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mediated phonological-semantic priming in spoken word production: Evidence for cascaded processing from picture-word interference.
    Mascelloni M; McMahon KL; Piai V; Kleinman D; de Zubicaray G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1284-1294. PubMed ID: 33818205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Picture-word interference in language production studies: Exploring the roles of attention and processing times.
    Bürki A; Madec S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):1019-1046. PubMed ID: 35389697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation of a semantic picture-word interference paradigm for future language mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation: A behavioural study.
    Jonen M; Heim S; Grünert M; Neuloh G; Sakreida K
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 412():113418. PubMed ID: 34153427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Lexical Cohort Size Is Independent of Semantic Context Effects in a Picture-Word Interference Task: A Combined ERP and sLORETA Study.
    Ouyang M; Cai X; Zhang Q
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():439. PubMed ID: 31920597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm.
    Abel S; Dressel K; Bitzer R; Kümmerer D; Mader I; Weiller C; Huber W
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):1113-24. PubMed ID: 19015036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related effects in compound production: Evidence from a double-object picture naming task.
    Lorenz A; Zwitserlood P; Regel S; Abdel Rahman R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1667-1681. PubMed ID: 30269664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic interference in the picture-word interference task: Is there a pre-lexical, conceptual contribution to the effect?
    Jescheniak JD; Wöhner S; Bethcke HS; Beaupain MC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):373-378. PubMed ID: 31898263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left posterior superior temporal gyrus on picture-word interference.
    Piai V; Nieberlein L; Hartwigsen G
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242941. PubMed ID: 33253319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.