BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25369354)

  • 1. Prioritising public health guidance topics in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
    Reddy BP; Kelly MP; Thokala P; Walters SJ; Duenas A
    Public Health; 2014 Oct; 128(10):896-903. PubMed ID: 25369354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment: a simulation exercise on metastatic colorectal cancer with multiple stakeholders in the English setting.
    Angelis A; Montibeller G; Hochhauser D; Kanavos P
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Oct; 17(1):149. PubMed ID: 29073892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prioritisation for future surveillance, prevention and control of 98 communicable diseases in Belgium: a 2018 multi-criteria decision analysis study.
    Klamer S; Van Goethem N; ; ; Thomas D; Duysburgh E; Braeye T; Quoilin S
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):192. PubMed ID: 33482767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis.
    Marsh K; Dolan P; Kempster J; Lugon M
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2013 Sep; 35(3):460-6. PubMed ID: 23241415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prioritisation of specialist health care services; not NICE, not easy but it can be done.
    Anderson P; Webb P; Groves S
    Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):978-985. PubMed ID: 28797706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accountability problem of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
    Hasman A
    Med Law; 2008 Mar; 27(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 18592883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NICE methodological guidelines and decision making in the National Health Service in England and Wales.
    Gafni A; Birch S; ;
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 12558466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NICE at 10 years: new challenges ahead.
    Littlejohns P
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2009 Apr; 9(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 19402803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pharmacopolitics and deliberative democracy.
    Rawlins MD
    Clin Med (Lond); 2005; 5(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 16268329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation.
    Eddama O; Coast J
    Health Policy; 2009 Mar; 89(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 18657336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England.
    Kelly M; Morgan A; Ellis S; Younger T; Huntley J; Swann C
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Sep; 71(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 20678836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) and efficient health care decision making with multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): applying the EVIDEM framework to medicines appraisal.
    Goetghebeur MM; Wagner M; Khoury H; Levitt RJ; Erickson LJ; Rindress D
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 21987539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance-Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation.
    Peel A; Jenks M; Choudhury M; Lovett R; Rejon-Parrilla JC; Sims A; Craig J
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2018 Dec; 16(6):819-836. PubMed ID: 30073485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and its role in assessing the value of new cancer treatments in England and Wales.
    Trowman R; Chung H; Longson C; Littlejohns P; Clark P
    Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Aug; 17(15):4930-5. PubMed ID: 21791636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public health at National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) from 2012.
    Kelly MP
    Perspect Public Health; 2012 May; 132(3):111-3. PubMed ID: 22700573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.