These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25369715)

  • 1. [Safety of use assessment in a radio-frequency medical device].
    Nicoletti G; Coppola A; Di Liberto R; Faga A; Scevola S
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2014; 36(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25369715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiofrequency identification and medical devices: the regulatory framework on electromagnetic compatibility. Part I: medical devices.
    Censi F; Mattei E; Triventi M; Bartolini P; Calcagnini G
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2012 May; 9(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 22702259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of radio frequency exposure from therapeutic diathermy equipment.
    Li CY; Feng CK
    Ind Health; 1999 Oct; 37(4):465-8. PubMed ID: 10547963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electromagnetic fields in offices.
    Sandström M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2006; 12(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 16790171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of safety guidelines to restrict exposure to stray radiofrequency radiation from short-wave diathermy units.
    Shields N; O'Hare N; Gormley J
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(13):2999-3015. PubMed ID: 15285261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Study of occupational exposure to magnetic fields among operators of magnetic resonance scanning at the Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital (Bergamo)].
    Cretti FR; Gambirasio A
    Med Lav; 2015 Jan; 106(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 25607283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental impact of the use of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in physiotherapeutic treatment.
    Gryz K; Karpowicz J
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2014; 65(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 24964580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiofrequency identification and medical devices: the regulatory framework on electromagnetic compatibility. Part II: active implantable medical devices.
    Mattei E; Censi F; Triventi M; Bartolini P; Calcagnini G
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2012 May; 9(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 22702260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Experimental evaluation of the occupational exposure to static magnetic fields on a 3 T magnetic resonance scanner].
    Moro L; Alabiso F; Parisoli F; Frigerio F
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2013; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23798231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health risk assessment of occupational exposure to a magnetic field from magnetic resonance imaging devices.
    Karpowicz J; Gryz K
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2006; 12(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 16790173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in the Polish Armed Forces.
    Sobiech J; Kieliszek J; Puta R; Bartczak D; Stankiewicz W
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jun; 30(4):565-577. PubMed ID: 28584321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Polish guidelines of 2001 for maximum admissible intensities in high frequency EMF versus European Union recommendations].
    Aniołczyk H
    Med Pr; 2003; 54(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 12924002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of various safety guidelines for electronic article surveillance devices with pulsed magnetic fields.
    Kang G; Gandhi OP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 12617530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electromagnetic immunity of medical devices: the European regulatory framework.
    Calcagnini G; Censi F; Bartolini P
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2007; 43(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 17938458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: is the future of interventional MRI safe?
    Hill DL; McLeish K; Keevil SF
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1135-42. PubMed ID: 16099687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging and safety aspects.
    Coskun O
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2011 May; 27(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 21112927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of occupational exposure to radiofrequency fields and radiation.
    Cooper TG; Allen SG; Blackwell RP; Litchfield I; Mann SM; Pope JM; van Tongeren MJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 15266067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of the potential impact of the European Union Physical Agents Directive (EU PAD) on electromagnetic fields (EMF) on MRI research practice in the United Kingdom.
    Perrin NM; Morris CJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Aug; 28(2):486-92. PubMed ID: 18666150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electromagnetic interference of cardiac rhythmic monitoring devices to radio frequency identification: analytical analysis and mitigation methodology.
    Ogirala A; Stachel JR; Mickle MH
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2011 Nov; 15(6):848-53. PubMed ID: 21926027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exposure of workers to electromagnetic fields. A review of open questions on exposure assessment techniques.
    Hansson Mild K; Alanko T; Decat G; Falsaperla R; Gryz K; Hietanen M; Karpowicz J; Rossi P; Sandström M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(1):3-33. PubMed ID: 19272237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.