1269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25370630)
1. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams.
Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental validation of the dual parameter beam quality specifier for reference dosimetry in flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon beams.
Simpson E; Gajewski R; Flower E; Stensmyr R
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(14):N271-81. PubMed ID: 26111099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between %dd(10)x and stopping-power ratios for flattening filter free accelerators: a Monte Carlo study.
Xiong G; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2104-9. PubMed ID: 18561686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo-based investigations on the impact of removing the flattening filter on beam quality specifiers for photon beam dosimetry.
Czarnecki D; Poppe B; Zink K
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2569-2580. PubMed ID: 28369978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental and Monte Carlo-based determination of the beam quality specifier for TomoTherapyHD treatment units.
Howitz S; Schwedas M; Wiezorek T; Zink K
Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 29031915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between the TRS-398 code of practice and the TG-51 dosimetry protocol for flattening filter free beams.
Lye JE; Butler DJ; Oliver CP; Alves A; Lehmann J; Gibbons FP; Williams IM
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(14):N362-72. PubMed ID: 27366933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical Note: On the impact of the incident electron beam energy on the primary dose component of flattening filter free photon beams.
Kuess P; Georg D; Palmans H; Lechner W
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4507. PubMed ID: 27487867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of k
de Prez L; de Pooter J; Jansen B; Perik T; Wittkämper F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045023. PubMed ID: 29461974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which accelerator photon beams are "clinic-like" for reference dosimetry purposes?
Kalach NI; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1546-55. PubMed ID: 12906172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calculation of stopping-power ratios using realistic clinical electron beams.
Ding GX; Rogers DW; Mackie TR
Med Phys; 1995 May; 22(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 7643785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of stopping-power ratios in flattening-filter free beams.
Ceberg C; Johnsson S; Lind M; Knöös T
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1164-8. PubMed ID: 20384253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor.
Muir BR; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo simulation of TrueBeam flattening-filter-free beams using varian phase-space files: comparison with experimental data.
Belosi MF; Rodriguez M; Fogliata A; Cozzi L; Sempau J; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Krauss H; Khamphan C; Fenoglietto P; Puxeu J; Fedele D; Mancosu P; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051707. PubMed ID: 24784373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extending the IAEA-AAPM TRS-483 methodology for radiation therapy machines with field sizes down to 10 × 2 cm
Mirzakhanian L; Bassalow R; Huntzinger C; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5209-5221. PubMed ID: 32815187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A Proposal for the Absorbed Dose to Water Dosimetry for Flattening Filter-free Beams].
Katayose T; Kawachi T; Miyasaka R; Kodama T; Takase N; Iriyama E; Chang W; Saitoh H
Igaku Butsuri; 2016; 36(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 28428458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose evaluation of Grid Therapy using a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam: A Monte Carlo study.
Martínez-Rovira I; Puxeu-Vaqué J; Prezado Y
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5378-5383. PubMed ID: 28736809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing electron contamination for photon beam-quality specification.
Li XA; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1994 Jun; 21(6):791-7. PubMed ID: 7935216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
