138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25370639)
1. Dose equations for shift-variant CT acquisition modes using variable pitch, tube current, and aperture, and the meaning of their associated CTDI(vol).
Dixon RL; Boone JM; Kraft RA
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111906. PubMed ID: 25370639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose equations for tube current modulation in CT scanning and the interpretation of the associated CTDIvol.
Dixon RL; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111920. PubMed ID: 24320453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analytical equations for CT dose profiles derived using a scatter kernel of Monte Carlo parentage with broad applicability to CT dosimetry problems.
Dixon RL; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4251-64. PubMed ID: 21859027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation dose calculations for CT scans with tube current modulation using the approach to equilibrium function.
Li X; Zhang D; Liu B
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111910. PubMed ID: 25370643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of radiation dose from tube current modulated CT examinations with considerations of both patient size and variable tube current.
Li X; Yang K; Liu B
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5413-5422. PubMed ID: 28681439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams.
Khatonabadi M; Kim HJ; Lu P; McMillan KL; Cagnon CH; DeMarco JJ; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051903. PubMed ID: 23635273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early first-trimester fetal radiation dose estimation in 16-MDCT without and with automated tube current modulation.
Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva GI; Nguyen G; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):860-4. PubMed ID: 18356429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the image quality of various fixed and dose modulated protocols for soft tissue neck CT on a GE Lightspeed scanner.
Weidemann J; Stamm G; Galanski M; Keberle M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 18182264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone beam CT dosimetry: a unified and self-consistent approach including all scan modalities--with or without phantom motion.
Dixon RL; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2703-18. PubMed ID: 20632581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations.
Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Stratakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1621-9. PubMed ID: 16013721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of dose-reduced scan protocols on cardiac coronary image quality with 64-row MDCT: a cardiac phantom study.
Fei X; Du X; Li P; Liao J; Shen Y; Li K
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jul; 67(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 17765422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose reduction for abdominal and pelvic MDCT after change to graduated weight-based protocol for selecting quality reference tube current, peak kilovoltage, and slice collimation.
Herts BR; Baker ME; Obuchowski N; Primak A; Schneider E; Rhana H; Dong F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):1298-303. PubMed ID: 23701068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality.
Flohr TG; Leng S; Yu L; Aiimendinger T; Bruder H; Petersilka M; Eusemann CD; Stierstorfer K; Schmidt B; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5641-53. PubMed ID: 20095277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between radiographic techniques (kilovolt and milliampere-second) and CTDI(VOL).
Elojeimy S; Tipnis S; Huda W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Sep; 141(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 20406742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of head and body CTDI(VOL) of dual-energy x-ray CT with fast-kVp switching.
Li B; Yadava G; Hsieh J
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2595-601. PubMed ID: 21776796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visualization and comparison of CT dose distribution between axial and helical acquisitions.
Yang K; Li X; Yu L; Li B; Marschall TA; Liu B
Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):4797-4808. PubMed ID: 37283112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging dose in variable pitch body perfusion CT scans: an analysis using TG111 formalism.
Axente M; Hristov D
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061912. PubMed ID: 24877823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
