These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25371226)

  • 1. Author's reply to Farebrother.
    Whittle J
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6629. PubMed ID: 25371226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New evidence about the benefits of PCI with regard to mortality.
    Farebrother MJ
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6624. PubMed ID: 25371225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in patients' perceptions of elective percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease: cross sectional study.
    Kureshi F; Jones PG; Buchanan DM; Abdallah MS; Spertus JA
    BMJ; 2014 Sep; 349():g5309. PubMed ID: 25200209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients' and cardiologists' perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease.
    Schenker Y; Meisel A
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Mar; 154(5):371. PubMed ID: 21357917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Percutaneous coronary intervention patients' and cardiologists' experiences of the informed consent process in Northern England: a qualitative study.
    Probyn J; Greenhalgh J; Holt J; Conway D; Astin F
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e015127. PubMed ID: 28647725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy precipitated by anticipation of elective coronary intervention.
    Kanawati J; Lowe HC
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 197():315-6. PubMed ID: 26151594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent for cardiac procedures: deficiencies in patient comprehension with current methods.
    Dathatri S; Gruberg L; Anand J; Romeiser J; Sharma S; Finnin E; Shroyer AL; Rosengart TK
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1505-11; discussion 1511-2. PubMed ID: 24629303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiologists' and patients' views about the informed consent process and their understanding of the anticipated treatment benefits of coronary angioplasty: A survey study.
    Astin F; Stephenson J; Probyn J; Holt J; Marshall K; Conway D
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2020 Mar; 19(3):260-268. PubMed ID: 31775522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed consent for interventions in stable coronary artery disease: problems, etiologies, and solutions.
    Chandrasekharan DP; Taggart DP
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 20934881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the Perceptions and Health Behaviours of Patients Following an Elective Ad-hoc Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Qualitative Study.
    Throndson K; Sawatzky JA; Schultz A
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2016; 26(2):25-32. PubMed ID: 27382669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Lee JH; Chuu K; Spertus J; Cohen DJ; James AG; Tang F; O'Keefe JH
    Mo Med; 2012; 109(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 22428453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Documenting ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Kostis WJ; Schulman SP
    JAMA; 2009 Mar; 301(10):1018; author reply 1018-9. PubMed ID: 19278939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CABG not PCI for most people with complex coronary artery disease.
    BMJ; 2013 Feb; 346():f1289. PubMed ID: 23447349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgery is the best intervention for severe coronary artery disease.
    Taggart DP
    BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7494):785-6. PubMed ID: 15802725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the quality of informed consent: it is not all about the risks.
    Fernandez A
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Sep; 153(5):342-3. PubMed ID: 20820045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disparate opinions regarding indications for coronary artery revascularization before elective vascular surgery.
    Pierpont GL; Moritz TE; Goldman S; Krupski WC; Littooy F; Ward HB; McFalls EO;
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Nov; 94(9):1124-8. PubMed ID: 15518605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical Graphic Narratives to Improve Patient Comprehension and Periprocedural Anxiety Before Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Trial.
    Brand A; Gao L; Hamann A; Crayen C; Brand H; Squier SM; Stangl K; Kendel F; Stangl V
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Apr; 170(8):579-581. PubMed ID: 30959523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advanced atherosclerotic plaque as a potential cause of no-reflow in elective percutaneous coronary intervention: intravascular ultrasound and histological findings.
    Ito S; Saio M; Suzuki T
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Nov; 16(11):669-72. PubMed ID: 15550745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces peri-procedural myocardial injury in elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.
    Zografos TA; Katritsis GD; Katritsis DG
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 May; 173(3):530-2. PubMed ID: 24681008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incomplete Revascularization in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: When Enough Is Enough.
    Ayalon N; Jacobs AK
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 9(3):216-218. PubMed ID: 26847113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.