These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25371294)
1. Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System. Tan JK; Tan EL; Kanagalingan D; Tan LK J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Apr; 41(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 25371294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple pregnancy is the leading contributor to cesarean sections in in vitro fertilization pregnancies: An analysis using the Robson 10-group classification system. Tan JK; Tan EL; Kanagalingam D; Yu SL; Tan LK J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1141-5. PubMed ID: 27251069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital. Triunfo S; Ferrazzani S; Lanzone A; Scambia G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():91-5. PubMed ID: 25898370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital. Chong C; Su LL; Biswas A Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1422-7. PubMed ID: 22897799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System. Barčaitė E; Kemeklienė G; Railaitė DR; Bartusevičius A; Maleckienė L; Nadišauskienė R Medicina (Kaunas); 2015 Nov; 51(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 26674145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system. Kelly S; Sprague A; Fell DB; Murphy P; Aelicks N; Guo Y; Fahey J; Lauzon L; Scott H; Lee L; Kinniburgh B; Prince M; Walker M J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Mar; 35(3):206-214. PubMed ID: 23470108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new way of looking at Caesarean section births. McCarthy FP; Rigg L; Cady L; Cullinane F Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 47(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 17627688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Abubeker FA; Gashawbeza B; Gebre TM; Wondafrash M; Teklu AM; Degu D; Bekele D BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Dec; 20(1):767. PubMed ID: 33298012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examining stratified cesarean section rates using Robson classification system at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital. Amatya A; Paudel R; Poudyal A; Wagle RR; Singh M; Thapa S J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2013 Sep; 11(25):255-8. PubMed ID: 24908526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Nakamura-Pereira M; do Carmo Leal M; Esteves-Pereira AP; Domingues RM; Torres JA; Dias MA; Moreira ME Reprod Health; 2016 Oct; 13(Suppl 3):128. PubMed ID: 27766941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mode of birth after caesarean section: individual prediction scores using Scottish population data. Denham SH; Humphrey T; deLabrusse C; Dougall N BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):84. PubMed ID: 30819140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolution of cesarean categories in a modified Robson classification in a single center from 2002 to 2012 due to high rate of maternal pathology. Jayot A; Nizard J J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jun; 42(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 27062530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying the Robson classification to routine facility data to understand the Caesarean section practice in conflict settings of South Kivu, eastern DR Congo. Mulinganya G; Bwenge Malembaka E; Lukula Akonkwa M; Mpunga Mukendi D; Kajibwami Birindwa E; Maheshe Balemba G; Temmerman M; Tambwe AM; Criel B; Bisimwa Balaluka G PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0237450. PubMed ID: 32898139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Robson ten-group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil. Ferreira EC; Pacagnella RC; Costa ML; Cecatti JG Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 129(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 25704253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section. Savchenko J; Ladfors L; Hjertberg L; Hildebrand E; Brismar Wendel S Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jul; 101(7):827-835. PubMed ID: 35292960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System. Hehir MP; Ananth CV; Siddiq Z; Flood K; Friedman AM; D'Alton ME Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 219(1):105.e1-105.e11. PubMed ID: 29655965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rates of caesarian section and trials and success of vaginal birth after caesarean sections in secondary care hospital. Bano R; Mushtaq A; Adhi M; Saleem MD; Saif A; Siddiqui A; Parveen T; Saif A J Pak Med Assoc; 2015 Jan; 65(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 25831682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the Robson Ten Group Classification System to categorise operative vaginal delivery. O'Leary BD; Kane DT; Kruseman Aretz N; Geary MP; Malone FD; Hehir MP Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Dec; 60(6):858-864. PubMed ID: 32350863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital. Mayne L; Liu C; Tanaka K; Amoako A J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 33938362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]